RadioBanter - View Single Post

November 20th 05, 02:21 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy

wrote:
From: Dave Heil on Nov 19, 3:59 pm

wrote:
From: "K4YZ" on Wed 16 Nov 2005 20:30
wrote:
From: on Nov 16, 2:20 am
Dave Heil wrote:

In my comments to the Commission, I did not find it necessary to target
a single individual or group, nor did I use terms like "puffery",
"egregious" or "insulting".
Poor baby. Does Davie think that all against the code test
are equivalent to "two-year-olds refusing peas at dinner"
as Robert Rightsell did?
And once again Lennie digs in with personal attacks...Yet INSISTS
that he doesn't do such things...
I don't. Dudly the Imposter can't distinguish between STRONG
formal commentary to the federal government and his usual
"putzy" venalities she makes to others in here...

Tell us, Len, what is "STRONG formal commentary"?

Apparently, anything that sets off David! :-)

Obnoxious people set me off, Leonard. Are you an obnoxious person? :-)
You used the term "STRONG formal commentary". What is it?

It doesn't matter to "judge' Heil since he discards any
"evidence" he doesn't like... :-)

It matters; it matters. Besides, I only discard the factually incorrect
material. :-) :-)

Does formal
commentary look like your derogatory comments toward Mr. Rightsell?

Are you Major Dud?

That'd be impossible. "Major Dud" is a fictitious character. You just
called me "David". Surely you know the difference. Does STRONG formal
commentary look like the stuff directed toward Mr. Rightsell?

Why do you "answer" to a reply to K4YZ?

Oh, did you think you were in an email exchange?

Why is it that you couldn't use the term "formal commentary"?

Why is it you can't shut up? :-)

Are you attempting to limit my First Amendment rights, Leonard, old boy?

For what reason was the word "STRONG" used and capitalized?

For what reason can't you let others - to whom replies are
clearly identified - reply for themselves?

You're posting in a usenet (not derived from "university network")
newsgroup. Anyone may post here in this amateur radio newsgroup (as
you've often pointed out) and anyone may reply to any post.

Why are you so fearful of opposing opinions against others?

You went way beyond "opposing opinions".

Can't take it anymore?

Does it appear that way to you?

You are no longer STRONG enough?

Strong enough for what, Len?

The rest of us readers have been waiting impatiently for the
PROOF of Dudly's claims.

I don't think so, Leonard. There is no evidence to support your statement.

There is no evidence to support your Johnson, either... :-)

My big Johnson is currently supported on a stout table.

[do you need a new supporter, scampering frisky one?]

Can you tell me how it is that you have knowledge of what "us readers"
are waiting for?

Here's a DOS Tip, heaping-big chief-of-the-keys: Just
make a formal statement to the FCC. WT Docket 05-235 is
still OPEN. You can file your little black heart out,
taking me to task for DARING to comment on something you
have "vested interest" in. You WILL be in public view for
as long as the Commission keeps that Docket open for
public view.

How would that answer the questions I posed to you? Why would I use the
same scurrilous methods used by you?

[WT Docket 98-143 is still open to the public for viewing
long after FCC 99-412 ordered the Restructuring of 2000;
you can even file on that one arguing NPRM 98-143]

If you need a model for a denunciatory reply to anyone,
go to that WT Docket 98-143, search for surname Robeson
at date 25 January 1999. There it is, "saddled and
waiting."

If I need such a model, I can easily reference your material about Mr.
Whitesell.

Of course, the FCC isn't considering such Comments after
the official ending date, but that is irrelevant to your
lofty purpose, isn't it? You are busy, busy, busy in
trying to shut up opposing opinions any which way you
can. Better improve on that because it isn't working.

So, why would I bother commenting if the FCC isn't considering the
comments? Were your comments submitted after the ending date? Aren't
they being considered by the FCC?

Keep the faith and keep on truckin to remove First
Amendment rights to every citizen who doesn't have an
official amateur radio license.

Didn't you just suggest that I shut up?

Need a copy of "My
Camp" in its original language?

You're parting with your signed, first edition? I'm honored, Len. I'm
good at the callbook address.

Seig Heil!

Interesting sig. I don't think we're related. That branch of my family
has been here for 140 years. The other branches had been here waiting
for better than 100-200 years.

Dave K8MN