RadioBanter - View Single Post

November 21st 05, 10:31 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy

From: Dave Heil on Mon 21 Nov 2005 04:19

wrote:
From: Dave Heil on Nov 19, 8:08 pm

Did Mr. Rightsell single you out for some personal criticism?

No, but you do not understand the procedings of public
commentary on Notices of Proposed Rulemaking.

"proceedings".

Try not to argue old v. new word useage, grasshopper.

Oops, forgot you are an extreme Literalist holding fast
to alternate words as well as alternate worlds.

I think I understand them fine.

I don't think so. :-)

One can dismiss or
argue against the views of another. It is not necessary to attack an
individual.

Tsk. No LAW against it, is there?

The way you are going on and on and on about it makes me
think you are preparing a civil suit for slander! Don't
get your legal briefs in a bind. You need better
tailoring for that suit.

Gotta look pretty for your boyfriend?

Think of
it as a form of politics. In politics the "gloves come
off" many times and that is acceptible.

You aren't in politics any more than you are in amateur radio.

Davie boy, you make absolutes on no basis whatsoever. :-)

You might check with a certain political party here in
California. But, you won't. You love calling your
opponents names.

I do not need any GPS device.

C'mon, Len. After reading some of your output here, I'd be surprised if
you could find your way to the bathroom on a foggy night.

You have to go outside to a toilet? Tsk, tsk.

I have a nice house with indoor plumbing. Had it for
over four decades.

I don't carry any purely hobby radio equipment, Len. There's just the
Amateur Radio Service equipment. I can drive and operate the radio
equipment simultaneously. I've not had a chargeable accident in years
and I've never had any accident while using a radio.

You are SO skilled! Never ever anything done wrong!

Or is that "writing" wrongs?

Abrogate your citizenship rights? That's blarney.

"Plain, simple fact:" WT Docket 98-143, 25 January 1999,
Comment by Robeson. Clear attempt by him to deny my
exercising First Amendment rights.

If that is indeed your view, you've made a clear attempt to deny Mr.
Rightsell's First Amendment rights.

Tsk. Not so. Was a Reply to Comments made BY Robert Rightsell.

Specific mentions of Rightsell's statements and my counter
to those. Had neat little footnotes which Jimmy Noserve
thinks are forbidden.

In contrast, Dudly (as Robeson) just didn't pick out any
specific statements I made. He just hopped up and down
that I should not be considered in a blanket statement.
Of course, that matters not since Robeson filed 10 days
after the final official date on Docket 98-143...which
made him essentially discarded by the Commission.

Heil has had ample time to file his own Reply to Comments
on my Replies to Comments. Heil has not. Heil wishes to
vent his bile, spite and anger in here. shrug

I'd never, never stoop to being that low in any documents submitted to
the U.S. Government.

Heavens no! Davie is from the Department of Diplomacy and
is the very model of a modern major diplomat!

Sort of like "Curveball's intelligence reports" making
Secretary Powell's speech in the UN "justifying" our
invasion of Iraq. Heil wants to be both, I think, with
an overdose of "Ahnold" the Governator. Powell got out
of government. Dubya is still in and over 2000 military
have died to further "democracy" and the Halliburton way
of life in Iraq. That leaves only the "informant"
sounding like so many long-time morsemen.

Yes, if I have anything to vent in the arena of
amateur radio policy, I'm likely to post it here.

Yes...ten kinds of nasty behavior in here, spleen spilling
out all over! :-)

You don't seem to know where to vent and where not to vent.

As far as Los Angeles Building Code is concerned, I know
exactly where to vent. Have a copy right here. I have
several other texts on ventilation, air cooling, etc.,
which have been used for venting excess heat. I think
you need those more than I after all the heat you're
generating into here... :-)

All note the title of this thread containing an overt personal
insult directed at myself. :-)

It most assuredly does. All of the material posted is, to the best of
my knowledge, completely factual.

Tsk. Your "knowledge" is both wrong and incomplete. :-)

You are just doing the personal insult thing...as usual.

[on "forking" - ]

A common cook's technique to ascertain the condition of meat
or fowl being cooked in an oven, grill, or barbeque.

Other than Super Chicken, do you know of any meat or fowl posting to
this newsgroup? Oh, it is "barbecue"

I know many who are most foul posting in here. Many have
a beef against the NCTA and wish to pick bones with them.
Most of their beefs sound fishy. Too much fowl matter.
Most seem chicken to address the subject rather than the
poster. That's not a feather in their cap, just
chicken****.

You say you are a ham? I say YOU are baloney. :-)

Try vegetarianism. Vegitate in front of a radio,
dreaming of a banquet of delicious DX. Don't do it
in a smokehouse; smoking not good for you but obviously
coming out of your ears. :-)