K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
cut
Two things come to mind:
(1) If you were REALLY that concerned, you would have done a
"Markie" and changed the subject line. This now makes the FIFTH
response with your name and call in it. Obviously it's NOT that big an
issue for you.
Steve, I get to decide what is an issue for me, and I decided a long
time ago.
What did you decide a long time ago?
what he decided that you were a jerk for one thing
it is something you prove again daily
you are a jerk and a coward
It was also explained to you a long time ago. Yet you ignore my wishes
because you're a jerk.
I ignore your wishes because you ignore everyone elses, Brian.
projecting again
You want what you want, and unless what someone else wants is only
that, too bad.
projecting yet again
While I've got your attention, why did you change Mark's attribution?
For the same reason you refuse to answer my question,
Brian...Because I want to.
meaning you are not into civlity and indedd that you advocate Rape by
your owns Standard
Now...if sandlot time is over, do we get an answer to the pending
question about YOUR lack of civility towards those who don't treat you
that way...?!?!
what lack of civlity are you reffering to?
Jim often isless than civil indeed is down right insulting in his
style
so Brain and myself for that give it right to him.
You OTOH allege anyone needs to accounts to YOU why they choose a given
style
You seem to be making a lot of noise about my alleged incivility,
Brian, but there's a lot longer history for you to account for.
no aleeged about
Or do we attribute that to the NCTA Double Standard that you and
the Feeble Five claim doesn't exist...???
no double standard exists except by theProcoders esp folks like you
that have avoided the same question for 7 year running
Steve, K4YZ