David Robbins wrote:

Does anybody have any knowledge or experience whether a tower is a
"structure," as the term is used in CC&Rs? -- e.g., "No structure may
be erected on any of the lots except for a single-family dwelling . . .
[then come the size limitations}. No more than one outbuilding may be
erected on any lot . . . [then come the size limitations}."

Of course it is a structure. After all, even when you apply for a permit
in a non-CC&R-infested area, everyone recommends applying for an
"antenna support structure", not a tower.
Besides, the whole idea behind CC&R's is to prohibit anything other than
houses in the neighborhood.


not in this town.. according to our local zoning and assessing people it has
to have a roof to be a 'structure' here. this is a question best asked of a
local lawyer who knows the local rules.

If that's the case in his town, then I'd be shocked if antenna towers
were not prohibited explicitly in that CC&R. Either way, he has to see a
lawyer.


73 ... WA7AA


--

Anti-spam measu look me up on qrz.com if you need to reply directly