On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:38:06 -0400, Bill wrote:

Lazy Senior wrote:

Bill wrote:
But what they DID

have was WMDs
-Bill


Bill
You been watching WAY too much Fox News Network.

Iraq HAD WMD's? Where you been the last year??

Lazy Senior

Where is your memory? What do you think he gassed his Kurdish citizens
with? Does that not count as a WMD or do you have a stricter
definition? Why were UN inspectors there so many years? What about the
program to DISMANTLE such manufacturing facilites after he invaded
Kuwait. Why did he throw out the inspectors?

Convenient for your side of the argument that you omit the implications
of 4000 murdered on US soil

Four full years later and you still can't get the numbers
right. Just ****ing give up.

and the need to mitigate such occurences in
the future. Your 'side' is very short on alternative solutions but very
long on criticism.

Bad recent intelligence? You betcha. No denying that. Sold a bill of
false goods by the President to start a war without any discernable
reason? Lets use the same standard of proof and stop playing partisan
roles.

WMDs or not the underlying issues remain and thats the radical doctrine
of killing anything/anybody Western. We've got plenty of proof there.
Do you need proof that the Saddam regime was sympathetic to this cause
and was a major point of instability in the region?

We ain't gonna win this one with simple hugs and trying to be good
neighbors...and we damn sure won't win it with internal bickering.
Bring us a good candidate to deal with this 'quagmire' in 2008.

Good night,
Bill