On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 03:45:24 GMT, John Barnard wrote:
Colin Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 05:38:03 GMT, John Barnard wrote:
Ignoring the potential radiological effects, the chemical toxicity is
well-documented. You can't ignore the data on the matter.
Check out : http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/document.asp?id=1431
Yes, it has a similar human health hazard to that of metallic lead.
I am still waiting for some evidence that DU dust is suspended in the
atmosphere.
--
There can be no triumph without loss.
No victory without suffering.
No freedom without sacrifice.
How quickly it settles is dependent upon the moisture wind in the area. A
heavy rain would mean very little would be suspended prior to settling.
Dry air, without any wind, gives it a little range and all bets are off
with a strong wind. Large particles will settle the quickest and smaller
particles will take more time.
Reference?
It sounds like you are making this up as you go along.
--
There can be no triumph without loss.
No victory without suffering.
No freedom without sacrifice.