| 
				 Dave the imoral hypocrtie 
 
			
			Dave Heil wrote:
 an_old_friend wrote:
 Dave Heil wrote:
 an_old_friend wrote:
 but
 nope Stevie is the one that brought it up
 
 Mark, *you* are responsible for everything you post to usenet, or place
 on a web site.
 
 but I am not responible if someone goes looking to places where such is
 right and proper and reposts
 In this case, the very foolish person who posted the
 perverse sex advert is *you*.
 
 why was it foolish
 
 gee If want the result i was asking it seems quite senible and logical
 
 Steve is not responsible for your
 choosing to do so
 never said he was
 
 he is responsible if he CHOOSES as he did to find and repost such
 materail
 
 
 .  If you didn't want it brought up, you should never
 have posted it.
 
 I don't mind you and stevie seem to mind
 
 and then you both object to answering why it is you post such materail
 that you find offensive
 
 What I object to is stevie posting then bitching about the results of
 his choice to bring the stuff HERE
 
 What I object is Stvei and yourself (as I recallyou have donethis)
 saying Todd is homosexual. I object to you and Steve when you falsely
 state I am homosexual instaed of telling the truth that I am bisexual
 
 you seem to find lying moraly objectionable, if that is the case why do
 you find it acceptable for Steve to tell lies
 
 
 and that brought out the annymouses et all
 
 The annymouses?  Is that really what you mean to say?
 
 yes
 
 
 you and stevie and your allies have been enaged in searching out
 everything you don't aprove of
 
 I don't have any allies, Mark.
 
 you are lying you do Stevie and your annymouses
 
 No, Mark, I am not lying.
 yes you are you have a clear ally and partner in your bashing Steve
 
 cuting the nosense
 Do you have allies?
 
 yes haven't you noticed?
 
 No, Mark, I've not noticed that you have any allies.  Could you name
 several of them so that we're all aware?  If you had allies, wouldn't
 they be supporting you in your latest nonsense?  I don't think anyone
 would want to be seen as supporting you.
 
 I am not responible for your lack of sight
 
 I could
 
 only if I needed them
 
 I am sure you think that
 
 
 You and Stevie and your allies have been taking the action you deem as
 fouling the NG
 
 That's incorrect, Colonel Morgan.
 
 no it isn't
 
 No matter how much you'd like to believe it, you are incorrect.
 
 then  you must be delusional
 
 
 
 Your feind and ally Stevie decided that he would make an issue in Jun
 of my sexaul oreintation
 
 My "feind"?  My "ally"?
 
 yes
 
 
 As I stated earlier.  If *you* didn't want your perverse sexual
 preferences known,
 why do you keep twisting the facts?
 
 I don't mind it being known
 
 you want me to hide it.
 
 I refuse to
 
 you object to knowing about it and that I refuse to hide it
 
 I need not hide it anymore than you have to hide your dsilike but you
 don't have the right to object to my refusing to hide something that
 offends you
 
 I would be happy to show all fo you Dave stevie, anybody, that is
 bothered by mysexuality, to try an avoid it being forced on your
 attention since it is irelavant to radio
 
 but I can't stop steve from posting threads with titles like "Mark
 Morgan has AIDS" or "warning Gay pagan.." that is stevie doing and then
 the unstable type pick it up and post more stuff you seem to find
 distateful
 
 what is moraly wrong is that you INSIT I am responible for mentioning
 my sexuality but Stevie is not
 cuting you moral venom
 
 the results from there ae hs fault not mine
 
 No, Mark, the results are *your* fault.  *You* posted the advert, not
 Steve.
 
 I posted it elsewhere
 
 Stevie posted it here
 
 I am not responible for stevie going out and reposting such materail
 
 you statement is absurd
 
 
 You've been fouling the group for
 some time now.  Your recent pathetic post-a-thon is way, way, way over
 the top.
 
 I am not responible for anyone's decison to post
 
 Yes, Mark, you are.  You are fully responsible for *your* decision to post.
 
 but not any on else what is what you are claiming
 
 What I am claiming, I wrote above.  You said that you aren't responsible
 for anyone's decision to post.  You are responsible for your own
 decision to post.
 
 then how am I rsponible for the reposting of varios ads?
 
 
 despite the fact you and Stvie lie and claim I am
 You see liars everywhere.
 
 more lie Dave
 
 See what I mean?  For grins, can you count the number of different
 posters in this newsgroup whom you have accused of lying?
 
 there are 2 liar amoug the human posters you and stevie
 
 Would you like time to think over that answer?  It is likely to come
 back and bite you very shortly.
 
 Threats? that is getting old
 
 
 Hans and Jim occasionaly does cross that line froom time to time
 
 Would you like to reconsider?
 
 no
 
 
 tha is hardly everywhere
 
 The number would extend to several times as many as you have claimed.
 
 According to you, just about no one tells the
 truth but you--and you've been known to lie at will.
 
 another lie
 
 See what I mean.  That isn't a lie, Mark.  You've accused quite a number
 of people who post here of lying and you have said that you'll lie at
 your convenience.
 
 no I haven't the Comode is not a person nor is mr slit or any of the
 other annymouses
 
 
 BB does seem to lie, len doesn't lie that I can tell he does push the
 edges
 
 Oh--Brian's a liar and Len is clean.  That's interesting.
 
 nah that was typo
 
 
 Dave K8MN
 
 
 |