an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
but
nope Stevie is the one that brought it up
Mark, *you* are responsible for everything you post to usenet, or place
on a web site.

but I am not responible if someone goes looking to places where such is
right and proper and reposts
In this case, the very foolish person who posted the
perverse sex advert is *you*.

why was it foolish

I suggest that you ponder the issue for a few hours or even days.
Perhaps the answer will come to you.

gee If want the result i was asking it seems quite senible and logical

Do you feel that it is getting the result you wanted here?

Steve is not responsible for your
choosing to do so

never said he was

he is responsible if he CHOOSES as he did to find and repost such
materail

The material was posted in a very public place. Google and Deja News
before it archive everything. You might as well have posted your advert
on the bulletin board at your local Kroger store.

. If you didn't want it brought up, you should never
have posted it.

I don't mind you and stevie seem to mind

For a guy who says he doesn't mind, your recent flood of nonsense posts
seems to indicate that you mind very much.

and then you both object to answering why it is you post such materail
that you find offensive

I find it very informative, Mark. I know what kind of person is on the
other end of the disjointed, kooky, accusatory posts you've made in the
past.

What I object to is stevie posting then bitching about the results of
his choice to bring the stuff HERE

I've never seen a comment by Steve in which he complains about the
results of reposting the material here.

What I object is Stvei and yourself (as I recallyou have donethis)
saying Todd is homosexual.

You recall wrongly. I could have called you a liar, but that'd be your
schtick.

I object to you and Steve when you falsely
state I am homosexual instaed of telling the truth that I am bisexual

Do you or have you had sex with men, Mark? If the answer is yes, you're
a homosexual. You may have sex with women, but you're still a
homosexual in that you participate in homosexual acts.

you seem to find lying moraly objectionable, if that is the case why do
you find it acceptable for Steve to tell lies

Steve, I don't find it acceptable for you to tell lies.

and that brought out the annymouses et all

The annymouses? Is that really what you mean to say?

yes

You can't say I didn't give you a chance.

you and stevie and your allies have been enaged in searching out
everything you don't aprove of

I don't have any allies, Mark.

you are lying you do Stevie and your annymouses

No, Mark, I am not lying.

yes you are you have a clear ally and partner in your bashing Steve

I'm not Steve's partner in this or any other venture, Mark. This is a
public forum.

cuting the nosense

If you cuted the nosense, you wouldn't have much to say.

Do you have allies?

yes haven't you noticed?

No, Mark, I've not noticed that you have any allies. Could you name
several of them so that we're all aware? If you had allies, wouldn't
they be supporting you in your latest nonsense? I don't think anyone
would want to be seen as supporting you.

I am not responible for your lack of sight

I could

only if I needed them

I am sure you think that

So, the fact is that you really don't have allies.

You and Stevie and your allies have been taking the action you deem as
fouling the NG

That's incorrect, Colonel Morgan.

no it isn't

No matter how much you'd like to believe it, you are incorrect.

then you must be delusional

That'd be an incorrect assumption on your part too.


Your feind and ally Stevie decided that he would make an issue in Jun
of my sexaul oreintation

My "feind"? My "ally"?

yes

Noooooooo.

As I stated earlier. If *you* didn't want your perverse sexual
preferences known,

why do you keep twisting the facts?

I've twisted no facts.

I don't mind it being known

I wrote "If *you* didn't want your perverse sexual preferences known..."

you want me to hide it.

I do? I don't care if you bray it from the roof top. It's a little
late for you to think about hiding it now, Mark.

I refuse to

You don't really have a choice at this point.

you object to knowing about it and that I refuse to hide it

You *can't possibly* hide it now, Mark. That cat's out of the bag.

I need not hide it anymore than you have to hide your dsilike but you
don't have the right to object to my refusing to hide something that
offends you

Get it straight, will ya. You can't hide your perverse preferences.
They're already out in the open.

I would be happy to show all fo you Dave stevie, anybody, that is
bothered by mysexuality, to try an avoid it being forced on your
attention since it is irelavant to radio

....but not irrelevant to the poster, no matter what the topic. Your
sexuality is a known. It is a given. If it weren't known by the
revelation of your kinky advert, it would have been know by your writing
of men talking to you on the phone, thinking they were talking to a
woman and wanting to marry you, or your thinking that Steve wanted to
have sex with you. Those goofy posts would have been a giveaway.

but I can't stop steve from posting threads with titles like "Mark
Morgan has AIDS" or "warning Gay pagan.." that is stevie doing and then
the unstable type pick it up and post more stuff you seem to find
distateful

You mean the other unstable types. Yeah, they do. A couple of them are
downright lunatics, Mark. You cuddled up to one in the newsgroup. He
turned out to be Roger Wiseman. His posts are extremely distasteful.


what is moraly wrong is that you INSIT I am responible for mentioning
my sexuality but Stevie is not

Not "INSIT" You can "insit" at the "outhouse" but I think you mean
"insist". I insist because *you made a personal decision" to post your
advert in a very public place, just like that bulletin board at the
Kroger store. If I'd seen it at the Kroger store and wrote it down and
shared the information with my friends at a local bar or a local
restaurant, we'd have the same outcome. Now if your sexuality was
closely guarded and someone got into your private papers and revealed
your secret, you'd have a different ballgame. In this case, you have no
reasonable expectation of privacy.

cuting you moral venom

The word is "cutting", Mark, "cutting" and you aren't cutting. The
words are still there.

the results from there ae hs fault not mine

No, Mark, the results are *your* fault. *You* posted the advert, not
Steve.

I posted it elsewhere

That matters not. You posted it in a public forum.

Stevie posted it here

....only because *you* made it public to begin with.

I am not responible for stevie going out and reposting such materail

If you'd not put it where it could be seen, nobody would have been able
to repost it. Then again, you claim that you aren't hiding it and
aren't ashamed of the ad, so why are you complaining?

you statement is absurd

The one about the ceramic monkey? Not really.

You've been fouling the group for
some time now. Your recent pathetic post-a-thon is way, way, way over
the top.

I am not responible for anyone's decison to post

Yes, Mark, you are. You are fully responsible for *your* decision to post.
but not any on else what is what you are claiming

What I am claiming, I wrote above. You said that you aren't responsible
for anyone's decision to post. You are responsible for your own
decision to post.

then how am I rsponible for the reposting of varios ads?

This will be the last time I'll attempt to explain it to you: Bulletin
board. Kroger store. Public. You authored it.

despite the fact you and Stvie lie and claim I am
You see liars everywhere.

more lie Dave

See what I mean? For grins, can you count the number of different
posters in this newsgroup whom you have accused of lying?

there are 2 liar amoug the human posters you and stevie

Would you like time to think over that answer? It is likely to come
back and bite you very shortly.

Threats? that is getting old

I made no threat. I told you what is likely to take place.

Hans and Jim occasionaly does cross that line froom time to time
Would you like to reconsider?

no

That's very foolish of you.

tha is hardly everywhere
The number would extend to several times as many as you have claimed.

According to you, just about no one tells the
truth but you--and you've been known to lie at will.

another lie

See what I mean. That isn't a lie, Mark. You've accused quite a number
of people who post here of lying and you have said that you'll lie at
your convenience.

no I haven't the Comode is not a person nor is mr slit or any of the
other annymouses

They aren't people? Are they robots? What about W0EX? What about Mike
Coslo? Are others coming to mind?

BB does seem to lie, len doesn't lie that I can tell he does push the
edges

Oh--Brian's a liar and Len is clean. That's interesting.

nah that was typo

I knew it had to be. Len isn't clean.

Dave K8MN