David wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:32:33 -0500, "Mark S. Holden"
wrote:


Snipped it all

Source this stuff from a more credible source (Perhaps "The Weekly World
News") and I might take it seriously.



What's not credible? Where's the official denial?


The basic premise of the story isn't credible.

Why would the White House officially deny a screwball claim like this?

As it stands now, relatively few people are even aware of this
fabrication. Most of the ones who believe the story would believe
anything critical of President Bush no matter how far fetched it is, and
they'd summarily reject a denial.

If the President responds, he creates a news story, and gives the web
site free publicity.