Antenna reception theory
Someone mentioned peak values in a posting about computer results. Since
Reg mentioned a discrepncy of 2 to 1, I was alerted to a possibility of
an error source. A-C and R-F instruments are often calibrated in
effective (rms) values. It is also customary to use rms values in
calculations. RMS is 0,707 X the peak value.*Conversely, the peak
value is 1.414 X the rms value.
If you multiply the peak voltge times the peak current, their product is
2X the effective (average) power..
Could Reg`s discrepancy stem from the diference beween peak and
effective values?
Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI
|