N9OGL wrote:
In article . com, "K4YZ"
wrote:

And WHAT "business"...?!?! The corner shoe-shine boy in the
barber shop?

NO STEVE I'M IN THE FOOD SERVICE BUSINESS, I OWN A LITTLE PLACE ON THE
SQUARE HERE IN TAYLORVILLE.

Ahhhh! A hot dog stand! Or you're the busboy at a Denny's or
Waffle House.

But I am wondering...Who eats anything YOU have put YOUR hands
on...?!?! Do they KNOW where those hands have been...?!?!

Steve, it was LOW POWER TV not LOW POWER FM, get your fact right before
posting. As for my "company" who said it's non-exisant? you a little
nobody. RIGHT!

LPTV...I stand corrected...However the rest remains correct.
Your "company" does not have a charter in the State of Illinois.
Nor is there a business license I can find.

But you forget one thing, as I've stated many times before, there's a
lot more to that LPTV deal it then you know. Secondly my "company" as
you claim isn't a business, it's a club, it always has been, since
1983.

No, it's not, unless you were lying in April.

Allow me to remind you:

QUOTE

Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy
From: "N9OGL" - Find messages by this author


(Remember when you still had wideband at home, Toiddie...?!?!

Date: 8 Apr 2005 15:37:06 -0700
Local: Fri, Apr 8 2005 4:37 pm
Subject: Boy broadcaster N9OGL - Part One
Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original
| Report Abuse

K4YZ wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
Our boy broadcaster/inventor has quite varied interests. Here's
some material gleaned from the archives:

HUGE SNIP

So it would appear that Todd and company (most likely just Todd...I
don't believe there's any "company" involved) screwed the pooch AFTER
getting an "OK" from the feds FOR their operation!

Not true ###HOLE, first there is a "comapny" mostly made up of amateur
radio operators. Second the Application was dismissed after congress
passed the Radio Broadcast Perservation Act of 2001. Before you go
spewing for LIES I would really suggest you get all the facts. You
don't know all the facts, you weren't there....so my opinion (EXPLITIVE
DELETED)

UNQUOTE

So...Toiddie...Are you lying now or were you lying in April?

Maybe a bit more to jog your mind, Toiddie?

QUOTE:

ABOUT LANGLEY PARK TELECOMMUNICATIONS

LANGLEY PARK TELECOMMUNICATION IS A NON-PROFIT ORGINIZATION WHICH
PROMOTES THEATER, TELECOMMUNICATIONS, AND THE PREFORMING ARTS
LANGLEY PARK WAS ESTABLISHED IN 1999-2000 BY TODD DAUGHERTY N9OGL AND
JIM BEUSINGER N9FU ALONG WITH OTHER HAM OPERATORS.

THE PROBLEM WITH THAT STEBIE IS IT HAS NOT BEEN EDITED FOR A LONG TIME, AS
A MATTER OF FACT WHEN I LOG IN TO GEOCITIES THEY SAY THE PAGE DOESN'T
EXIST. I THINK YOU ALSO MISS THE POINT THAT UNDER THE LAW BOTH THE STATE
OF ILLINOIS AND FEDERAL LAW A ORGINIZATION, CLUB OR WHATEVER DOESN'T HAVE
TO PAY TAXES IF THEY MAKE NO MONEY WHAT'S SO EVER.

The fact of the matter is that your "company" doesn't exist save
for the vast deepness of your imagination.

So today (just below...) you state this was started in 1983, yet
in April you said it was 1999.

That's a 16 year error.

NO YOU #### ****HEAD, IN THE 90'S THE GROUP WAS REORGINIZED CREATING A NEW
"REINCARNATION" OF THE GROUP.

But that's not what you said before.

So I reiterate my question...Were you lying then, or are you lying
NOW...?!?!

"I'VE ALWAYS WANTED TO ENTERTAIN PEOPLE" SAID TODD DAUGHERTY
CEO/PRESIDENT OF LANGLEY PARK.

Well, then, Toddy m'boy, You've succeeded!

And I re-address your use of "CEO/PRESIDENT"

IT'S A TITLE BIG ####ING DEAL!

It's just one more bit of proof that you've been lying and got
CAUGHT!

That's why the subject line of this thread is "Keeping Track of
Toiddie's Tales".

"LANGLEY PARK WILL CREATE A PLACE WHERE IDEAS CAN ROAM FREE AND PEOPLE
CAN SHOW OFF THEIR TALENTS"

It started in 1983 as DDC-TV...(SNIP)

Dumb, Dumber and Clueless-TransVestites...?!?!

So...Here we've caught you screwing up SEVERAL stories...

Which one is true?

Dam right, and there's NOTHING yo can do about it Bwahahaha
Sure there is.

RIGHT.....you've been saying that for a long time now...

Uh huh. And it's still true.

TRUE THAT YOU AREN'T GOING TO DO NOTHING ABOUT IT BUT ACT LIKE AN ###HOLE
ON HERE.

Why would I act like you? We already have one-too-many of YOU
here as it is!

Sooner or later you'll get jammed up, Toiddie, and you'll wish
you'd spent your precious "freedom of speech" on something meaningful.

Keep dreaming steve.

Nope.

STEVE ANIMATION CHILD PORN IS LEGAL, THE PERSON WHO WROTE THAT ARTICLE
WROTE IT INCORRECTLY.

So...You acknowledge that you DO support "child pornography"....

So you ARE the degenerate that all here have claimed you to be...

PAINTING, CARTOONS, SCULPTURE, AND DRAWING ARE EXEMPTED FROM THE LAW.

But the FACTS are that Todd Daugherty, N9OGL, DOES support child
pornography.

THE PERSON WHO WROTE THAT ARTICLE SAID THE OPPOSITE
OF WHAT THE LAW STATES. WHICH SHOW YOU NOT TO BELEIVE EVERYTHING YOU READ
ON THE INTERNET. THE MAN THAT WAS ARRESTED HAD ANIMATION PORN, BUT HE ALSO
HAD A HUGH COLLECTION OF REAL CHILD PORN WHICH WAS A VIOLATION OF HIS
PROBATION. THE MAN HAD BE ARRESTED BEFORE FOR
HAVING REAL CHILD PORN AN SPENT TIME IN PRISON, HE WAS RELEASE AND WAS PUT
ON PROBATION AND HE DOWNLOAD THIS MATERIAL AT WORK AND WAS CAUGHT AND
REALLY WAS FOUND GULITY OF VIOLATING HIS PROBATION. ME, I DON'T MESS WITH
REAL CHILD PORN, NEVER HAVE, I'M INTO JAPANESE ANIMATION AND HENTAI.

You're into child pornography.

Even the suggestion of acceptance of children engaging in adult
sexual activity is sick. That there are people like you who find a way
to "openly" hide your activites is even moreso.

The "problem" for people like you is that you "get away" with
stuff like this for now, but it only emboldens you to other acts.
Sooner or later, you'll find yourself behind bars wishing you'd
exerecised your "Freedom of Speech" on something more meaningful that
the concept of children having sex.

Animation Porn, even lolicon is LEGAL and in 2001 the US Supreme Court
ruled that "virtual child porn" (which includes animation lolicon) WAS
protected by the First Amendment. Beside what are going to do about
it??? NOTHING, grow up steve you little worm

I'm already "doing something" about it, Todd.

What tell your mommy??

Nope.

YOU AIN'T DOING #### ABOUT IT STEVE, EXCEPT GET ON HERE AND CRY LIKE A
LITTLE BITCH.

Sure I am...Toiddie. I've already proven that I can effect
change. Why do you continue to suggest otherwise?

No, I don't suggest that ANYthing is going to happen over
night....but it will...

YOU CAN'T DO NOTHING ABOUT IT BECAUSE IT'S LEGAL, VIRTUAL
PORN WAS DEEMED PROTECTED BY THE FIRST AMENDMENT BY THE US SUPREME COURT
IN 2001. THE PURPOSE OF CHILD PORN LAWS IS TO PROTECT CHILD IN MAKING OF
IT, SINCE VIRTUAL PORN IS FROM SOMEONE'S IMAGINATION THERE IS NO VICTIM,
THUS NO CRIME (ACCORDING TO THE US SUPREME COURT) EVEN IN FEBER VS NEW
YORK IN THE 70'S THE SUPREME COURT RULED THAT SOME CHILD PORNOGRAPHY WAS
LEGAL, IT'S THE PROCESS OF MAKING IT THAT MAKES IT ILLEGAL.

Like I said, Toiddie...the problem for people like you is that
letting you "take an inch" means you'll eventually try to take a
mile...And in that effort you'll lose your freedom. But then the rest
of us will be just a little bit safer from people like you!

Steve, K4YZ