Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On 29 Dec 2005 08:56:30 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
NOGL wrote:
an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
Then straighten Brian out. He thinks you mean "Queer".
I just did but you had to bitch and moan about soemething didn't you
I like make Brain moan. I love him long time.
N0GL almost certainyl not write
Oh?
How do YOU know?
becuase the header was a fraud as anyone looking could tel
Uh, Colonel Morgan? Todd's call is N9OGL. The poster of the article
which you call a forgery is NOGL. They are not the same. The "9" in
Todd's call is not silent as we're not writing in the Klingon tongue.
you are correct i did miss that flaw in the forgery but then there
wereso many that it was easy to hide, none the less you are correct My
bad I apoligize to anyone that was confused
However it merely reinforces my conviction that it is almost certain
that Todd N9OGL did not prodcue that forgery leaves as I said the
Stevie the most likely suspect as I said
Yes there was a slight chance that Tood was the forger which I why I
siad almost certainly instead of certainly
Tood? What a complete buffoon you are, Colonel.
back to poking fun at my disablites again
go ahead since i get stop you anyway helps me make any point I ever
want to about you
Toodle-ooh.
Dave K8MN