View Single Post
  #14   Report Post  
Old January 5th 06, 09:48 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
K4YZ
 
Posts: n/a
Default More Markie Mularkie


wrote:
On 4 Jan 2006 17:04:14 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
an Old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
On 31 Dec 2005 17:01:09 -0800,
wrote:

Jim, how did it go? Did you copy them on 20M?

why did they choose that band how would they ever know wether the
report came from hearing some loca or world wide skip. seem silly to
me if they want data of any value to use that band and mode

Someone put this day on the calendar.

why?

Obvioulsy you were too impatient to read further before
commenting, then too stupid to go back and edit after reading why.

lie


Nope.


yes you lied


Nope.

therefore child abuse


You've stopped the meds again, haven't you, Markie?


nope but you just admitted YOU need to be on the meds


No, I did not.

you are the one that claimed lying= child abuse


No, Markie, I did not.

I said TEACHING CHILDREN TO LIE is child abuse.

Try to get this right!

You've been misquoting this all week! (As if misquoting is new to
you...riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight!)

Mark FINALLY said something with which I can wholeheartedly,
unrepentingly agree with.

it is not the first time

It's the first time in 7 years. That's long enough to have been
declared dead in most states.


lie d there too and cut out the response

cowardly ling at that


You need to get those "anger control issues" back under control,
Markie.

Your dreck in here is barely readable as it is, then you go off
the deep end and it get's worse.

it is not even the first time you have done so in my own name


but anything on results?

Ditto.

73

can't go a whole post without lying eh steve

What lie?

The "73"...?!?!

Mark, when you act right, discuss things in a meaningful manner
and do so without being snide, slanderous, profane or presumptive, I
have no problem addressing you like I do anyone else, and that includes
sending you a "73".

you lied in your post long before your got to the 73


Nope.


yes you did


Nope.

you lied in saying it was the first time in 7 years you agreed with
and you lied in saying I had not read your post and other places as
well


Such as?

and with your choose to be insulting


Huh?

And if you'll notice, those "73" 's are very few and very far
between!

indeed you are very rare with your 73's

but you don't even meet the Stadards you set


What's a "stadard"...?


something you don't have


What's a "stadard"...?!?!

It's not in Websters.

I've not set any "stadards", Markie, whatever a "stadard" is.

Steve, K4YZ