On 10 Jan 2006 04:48:30 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
http://news.com.com/2102-1028_3-6022...=st.util.print

Guess this means you've got to start using your real name in your
posts, eh, Brain?

he does

he uses his choosen signature per the electronic ducments act (or
whatever the name was fro alowing signatures over the interenet

as was my sgattack sig file my signature to my post even fromt he fake
email adies


In any case, the article mentioned the likelyhood of not being
able to enforce this, however it will be interesting to see if any case
law is developed from it in the near future.

it would indeed the provsion wereajoke amoug lawyers before the bill
was even signed

It also suggested the likelyhood that anonymous tipsters might be
detered by this law. I doubt it. However I also believe that if you
have a complaint to make, there's more strength in standing up for what
you believe in and putting your name on it rather than slinging mud
from behind anonymity.

depends on ones goal of course

If you don't have the strength of conviction of your own words to
put your name behind them, why make them?

73

Steve, K4YZ

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account