On 10 Jan 2006 18:57:51 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:
On 10 Jan 2006 05:02:44 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 22:18:06 GMT, "Bill Sohl"
wrote:
Jim, Len, Dee, et al;
Given the current sad state of affairs with regard to the
proliferation of postings and new subject lines which
show an absolute total and complete disregard for the
intended purpose of this newsgroup (RRAP), I am
signing off here...at least for the forseeable future...
or until the postings of a handful of subject matter
abusers choose to take their petty personal squabbles
elsewhere.
Cheers to all who discuss, debate, argue or contribute
showing a level of knowledge and respect for the
process and the others doing the same,
No cheers for the handful of unkempt, societal misfits
who are the abusers of that same process.
indeed steve why you can't allow discussion to contiue on any subject
here rmotely conected with radio is amaazing
More Mark not taking any resposiblity for his own culpability.
nope
Yep.
nope
what we see is stev saying nothingis his afult
Nope. Not at all. But my comment was directed at your comment.
Nothing more, nothing less.
you lied as you know by now since your ead (or you imply ) you have
read the rest of the post
more amazing is that you expect your victums to tolerate attack like
mark morgan caught on tape molesting an 8yo in silence is even more
amzing
Ditto.
I am no way respinble your post titled " mark morgan caught on tape..
No...You're just "respinble" for the other 852 other posts.
and you are responible for more than 11,000 post containing most a
seris of personal attacks, muck racking and lies
and you avoid admit that you are responible for the Mark Morgan caught
on tape post.. a post that proves you a liar
a tactic you repated todayin claiming that sexual orientaion other
than one one you aprove is mental illness
Who are you talking to, Markie?
the ng in general, obviously
No, it wasn't so obvious.
then you are stupid but we knew that (most of us anyway0
when we have had that discussion beofre and shown you wrong
yes I have choosen finaly to fight fire with fire but een then I don't
lie about you or anyone else
No...you've chosen to show that your brain's on fire and that
there's not a fire extinguisher in sight.
nope I haeve chosen to fight your constant atatcks with the same
No, you chose to spam the NG with hundreds of posts...Not just
ones responding to the posts you didn't like.
and you have choosen to make more than 11,000 post containing your
foul mouthed ****
I chose to out shout you in effect for awhile and you can't stand it.
so you whine and whine about it
be a man if you can. I frankly doubt.
Indeed i doubt you can tell the truth about your dees een if someone
were holding a gun to your daughters and threatening to murder them
youd still refuse to admit the truth that you lied in making the post
Mark Moragn caught on tape..."
you could try to stop your from enaging your contiued character
assignation but then it seems you'd have nothing to say
Why are you accusing Bill Sohl of "character assignation"
(sic)...?!?!
noi such acsation is made
Good. Don't want any "acsation", WTF that is...
you lied again
Nope.
you have lied
and showed that you know exactly who the target of that remark is
you steve
And here you are ignoring your own culpability AGAIN Markie.
no I a not I have addressed that both again in this post and in a
number of others
He mentioned neither person nor callsign.
agred
Feeling a bit guilty, Markie?
not all You are the guilty party
And again.
still dening your own role
you have left only 2 choices to me to leave the feild of fight back to
fight your flame with flame I chose the later, but without your
actions I could engage ion this flame war, most of which consist f
reporting yout post
It is simply impossible for me to carry out such a action without your
posting as fdder
Steve, K4YZ
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account