On 11 Jan 2006 02:48:09 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
Sure it is. It's ANY persons responsiblity to determine that they
have LEGAL permission to use another persons name, records, etc. You
didn't do that.
and you gave it to me I merely decided to take you at your word for
once
No...You took advantage of it.
yes sure you got that right I took advantage of it. your point?
Thank-you for making mine.
you aree welcome
(Sheeeeesh you're easy, Morgan!)
you seem crazy enough to grant such premission I thought with the
intent of whining about my taking you up on the offer
If you thought it was "crazy", then YOU should ahve questioned it
further.
why? not my job to protect you from your own acts. It is hard eneough
to protect myself from your actions here on RRAP
What you need to protect yourself from Markie IS yourself!
nope you ae the only real person I need protection from here
but you avoid the issue again
It is not my duty to protect you from your mistakes
that jobs is yours
That you took advantage of a sarcastic remark.
I took you at your word
You took advantage of a sarcastic remark.
i took you ar your word
I took adavantage of your mistake
My "mistake", Markie, was assuming you would understand that your
use of my daughter and father like that would certainly bolster my
dossier on you.
your mistake waas amking an admission that would torpedo any case weak
you did have
No rational person would think that another person would readily
render such "premsiion" to abuse a loved one.
No rational person beleive that a rational person would do, butI don't
beleive you are rational
just the way you use any spelling error I make to avoid the point I was
making
Which spelling error?
now you are not even man enough to admit you play at speeling cop
you take advantage of My diability
If being lazy and wantonly ignorant is a "diability", then I'll
sign your welfare checks myself.
now you just lie some ore
I take advantage of your mistakes.
looks fair to me
If you say so.
and you just made another damming admssion
You're a thief.
no Sir you are a fraud
Nope. But you're still a thief.
i have stolen nothing comitted no larceny
No larceny since one cannot put a dollar value on what you stole,
but steal you did.
and there you have your problem in the courts steve , even f you get
past all the problems with yur case you lack the one thing that as
keept me from suing you over the year, damages
you just admited to know that you have no moniitary damages
since you can't bak that u it is slander
Sure I can back it. I have hundreds of your posts on CD abusing
my father and daughter.
you do not have any abuse on me abusing them
you have me using litery license usingtwhat they might say to attack
you
all I did was take advantage of your foolishness
And made an even bigger fool of yourself.
then file **** or get off the pot
you cLaim I am foolish and all you do is take advatage of that
You make it easy to do, Markie.
not realy but you aredeluded enough to think so
Your "lawyer" will do the same thing...get his retainer then tell
you to get your checkbook out for even MORE writing fun.
nah he will look at what chit you file and shake his head ver your
stupidity
"hoist by your petard"
do check your references before you flame those spelling
Markie, I can live with the less than 1% of my typed words having
a mispelling. I can live with it from anyone. YOU do it to the point
of unintelligibility on a daily basis.
and you avoid the word just as you said you don't
do
boring steve
It's that lack of willingness to fix your own problems and to work
to truly undertsand the language you claim to be proficient at that
get's you into trouble.
yhoist by your petard
a phrase you are clearly too stupid to have encoutered before
Steve, K4YZ
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account