On 15 Jan 2006 07:03:18 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
cut
is that you try to lie and deceive in this
forum and I won't let you get away with it.
You assume that you have control over other people. You do not.
But I do.
I respond to your comments. You respond in turn. I know that
certain comments will elicit certain responses from you. It works.
Your remarks, "Raped and old friend" have yet to elicit a explanation
from you.
No explanation was necessary.
Asking why you could post anything that despicable brings only silence
from you.
How is it despicable? Markie has proudly boasted of perverted
Proudly boasted? how did I do this?
after some of the barbarian (including yourself) went digging around
and reposted materail that I am not ashamed (just never thought they
belonged her) I admknowledged them and we tried to go
but you keep making a big deal of so I defend my right to be and to do
what I wish amoug consetning adult
if that is "Boasteing"
sexual and other personal preferneces, and did at one time indicate a
prediliction for forceful sex, domineering relationships.
so what? I like dominating sex amoug consenting adults
that is not rape
and it does not cover Mark morgan caught on tape....
why do you post despticble thing about
ywhy do you lie about them the health of their families
Real "issues" are not
discussed nor "debated" in this "forum".
Thanks to your fueding with every-damned-body, there very, very little
room for actual civil discussion. Thanks a lot.
There's an almost unlimited amount of bandwidth here, Brain.
Indeed. Mark showed you that.
What Mark "showed me" had nothing to do with bandwidth and
everything to do with his mental defect, Brain.
self denefsen is a mnetal defect
ok so you think so
Your on-going defense of him shows me (and the rest of the NG)
yours.
If you need THAT much room, then perhaps you need to pare down
your rhetoric a bit.
Mark has asked why you need to comment on a person's sexual orientation
in an amateur radio newsgroup. He has also asked you to eliminate your
comments on people's sexual orientation in an amateur radio newsgroup.
He has. And I answered him.
no you have not
you lied
saying that you not bring it iI did not does not answer why you
brought it up in the first place
His response was to go on the
aforementioned tirade.
I've asked YOU why you insist on suggesting that others act one
way and then do it yourself.
becuase he does not
you do
explain yourself it my job or bb to explain your behavour
You've answered with YOUR silence.
what was your question?
And my "arguments" are pretty well narrowed down to you and your
Feeble Five bretheren. I can communicate effectively, if not outright
get along with, everyone else here fairly well.
Hmmm? Bill Sohl left. Few others are active. Best of luck
communicating effectively with "everyone else."
You're here. What's YOUR excuse?
what exucse does he need
Where's YOUR "meaningful debate" or "thoughtful
intercourse"...?!?!
ghe has particated in every on topic thread int he NG as theycoame
with disrupting them
as I have I
you havebn't indeed you have tried (and many cases suceeded in
disputed such threads
Where are the answers to questions put ot you YEARS AGO on
subjects you thought you'd never be challenged on, yet can't seem to
get past...?!?!
they will be answered after you answer yours no doubt
But then most of the rest of the folks here don't see fit to
attack me or to lie in order to get a point across.
Perhaps they think you're not worth the trouble. Others are just tired
of your nonsense.
Perhaps they won the lottery. Perhaps I'm not the only one that
they have a "problem" with.
prehaps
MOST LIKELY is that this NG has accomplished exactly SQUAT, even
when there was "meaningful intercourse".
perhaps
On the otherhand, one of my pieces in this forum was a featured
article in Worldradio magazine (for which I was paid a fee, however I
returned it uncashed). My comments are routinely quoted in "CQ"
magazine. Myself and several other regular posters appear in various
"CQ" quotes on a semi-frequent basis.
so what?
And we have YET to see "N0IMD" in ANY such role. Not even a
mention as a "slim" in any DX journal during "Restore Hope". Nor do we
see KB9RQZ, N9OGL, Frankie of Silliland nor Lennie the Loser.
a lie steve
your self complented me on something in CQ VHF
You and your "brothers" have yet to master that.
There is always your model. Mark has found it very effective.
You better redirect credit where credit is due...To your "brother"
in California.
nope len is not my model you are steve
With the lies and innuendo
bestowed by you and your bretheren, it's nye-on impossible.
Projection.
Nope. Not a bit.
And what YOU "know" fits in a thimble, and leaves room for
seconds.
More projection.
Nope. Careful obeservation, evaluation, assessment and summation.
Steve, K4YZ
If you're going to lie about yourself, you might as well make it a big
one. And I see you have.
See what? (Step away from the mirror and try again, Brain...You're
confusing yourself....)
npe you are projecting it i quite to claer everyone but you and dave
Steve, K4YZ
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account