an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 05:00:11 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:
cut
then don't dod it
I din't, I din't dood it.
fine
If you can't write what you mean to convey, it isn't my problem.
never said it was, unless you want to understand it then it become
your problem
Sorry, Einstein, it doesn't work that way.
but it does work that way
No, it assuredly does not.
yes it does
I made it perfectly clear that it does not.
but you are worng of course
I might be "worng", but I'm not wrong.
I decide what serves my ends not you
That's simply too much information.
If you can't communicate with those who can
read the language, then the problem is all yours.
only if I care about comuicating with you
If you don't care about "comuicating",
again you decided to lie about the statement I said comicating with YOU
You are a complete twit.
alter the stament and render the answer meaningless
You've not come up with an answer. Why does a "stament" even need an
answer?
what was I telling you about context earlier
Nothing important.
I a quie convinced you can't ynderstnad muuch of anything I say or that
anybody else you are oposed to says.
Well, there you have it. I a quie sure that nobody ynderstnad muuch of
anything you say.
...you have shown in your postsing
over the years
I've done absolutely no postsing at any time.
therefore I will spare NO effort at your will
Really? Then hop to it.
Dave K8MN