From: K4YZ on Jan 19, 3:05 am

wrote:

Even more basic than that, though, is Dudly's FAILURE to produce
ONE item, documentary or from anyone else, of his vaunted
"active military service in the USMC."

Sorry, Lennie.

A LIE on your part.

I've produced NUMEROUS references to verifyable third-party
sources of my service.

Tsk, tsk, tsk, trying to perpetuate your own LIE by calling
others "liars?" :-)

1. Not a single DD-214 copy anywhere of yours to be seen.

2. Not a single military document copy of yours to be seen.

3. Not a single individual's reference to attest to your
having been on active USMC duty at any time during your
claimed 18-year active duty.

4. Not a single photograph, snapshot, or other memento of
yours to be seen from your "18-year USMC active duty."

5. Not a single newspaper or other periodical copy to state
of your having entered the USMC, left the USMC, or even
served in any capacity on active duty to be seen.

6. Your constant use of wrong terms and jargon in use by
the USMC is indicative of NOT being ON active duty.

7. Your failure to know of ANY USMC avionics equipment by
either nomenclature or familiar name is indicative of
NOT being involved with such electronic equipment.


All of which points to YOU lying about it.

No "lie" if there is nothing at all to attest to your USMC
service visible to others. All we have is YOUR claims to
the fact.


That's why I can say "Leonard H Anderson is a know liar and
deceiver" in a public forum and not have to worry about getting sued.

Is there some civil suit upcoming involving you? :-)

I don't "LIE" in a public forum such as this. I've given enough
references on my military service and my (much-longer) civilian
career in radio-electronics...including several personal
references who are licensed radio amateurs, one of which served
with me in the same Army unit at the same time. The Pacific
edition of the Stars and Stripes military newspaper carried my
interview on Hardy Barracks in Tokyo in the 50s, including my
own photos of that time. [one of those in one photo was Stan
Peschel, died about a year ago according to industry association
news]


Frankie's done nothing except try to bark loud and hope no one
notices that he's just a shivvering little lap dog without the
resources to live up to his bark.

Tsk, tsk, tsk...looking in your own mirror again? :-)

Frank Gilliland has provided several references, mostly photos
of his USMC service time (good ones), including a digitization
of a telephone coin used in a foreign country...something that
would be familiar to anyone using the same sort of coin. The
part of his DD-214 is certainly a reference, something which
you do NOT have visible to anyone.

Frank has "told it like it is" in detail, regardless of the
situations he found himself in and makes no moral judgement on
anyone else. You, on the other hand, have yet to PROVE you've
actually been on active USMC duty in any way.


And that's why I can say Frank Gilliland is a liar and deceiver in
a public forum and not be concerned about law suits either. He'd never
be able to demonstrate otherwise.

"Dudly's done nothing except try to bark loud and hope no one
notices that he's just a shivvering little lap dog without the
resources to live up to his bark."

Tsk, tsk, all that "law suit" talk again! :-)

Seems to everyone else that Frank Gilliland can certainly
prove HIS USMC service by enough references and links given
in this public forum. "We" have seen nothing comparable to
yours.


As to "working in Marine avionics," Dud has NEVER mentioned a
single nomenclature or familiar name of ANY piece of avionics
equipment used on USMC helos or any other aircraft. That's
an unheard of thing with those who've been IN ACTUAL work on
those aircraft.

Why?

To prove you were actually involved with such avionics work.

Unless you care to discuss the CONVERSION of those devices to
Amateur use, there's not a bit of need to do so.

In other words, YOU DON'T KNOW THE STUFF. :-)

You are trying to make excuses for NOT being familiar with
any of that equipment. Very transparent.

I COULD run off at the mouth ala-Lennie with nomenclatures,
manfacturers, etc, but it means nothing.

"It means nothing" because you CANNOT do so. :-)

After years of working with such equipment you CANNOT remember
a single name? You cannot get the crypto terms correct...even
though encryption is definitely a no-no in amateur radio use.

You've never worked with such equipment, something clearly
evident in NOT mentioning names or terms.



Well, there you go with half-baked "quotes" and innuendo as if
you'd not been given the details before...Or as if all of the
information isn;t on my QRZ "Bio" under K4YZ...Again, all information
that can be verified and corroborated by the authorizing agencies.

WHAT "agencies?" Verification by "call the VA?" :-)

Just digitize your latest DD-214, black out your SSN, and make
that image available to all via a link somewhere...or by e-mail
attachment. Everyone who was actually IN the military of the
USA got a DD-214. Those who don't have one now can get a copy
from NARA (National Archives and Records Administration) in
St. Louis. A copy can be obtained via e-mail now...but the
requestor must supply his/her own SSN and (if applicable) their
service serial number.



So is "liar", but you seem to wear it like the Congressional
Medal, Lennie.

I don't "LIE," Dudly. Don't have to.


We could show YOUR "good side" of professional electronic
engineering, but hey, YOU have already done if for us!

No, not for "professional electronic engineering." Few in
here are involved in that. You certainly have NOT been
involved in that.

I am a Life Member of the IEEE, a professional organization.
The IEEE has a Code of Ethics regarding electronics (and
electric) engineering and I follow that.



A person is not a liar unless they are NOT telling the truth.

Dudly is, "by NOT telling the truth," claiming fradulent
service with the USMC. Dudly only CLAIMS to have done things,
has presented NO evidence or references of any kind to
corroborrate his claims.


YOU have been found NOT telling the truth on occassions far too
numerous to count.

"occasion." [get your S out of there...]

Tsk, tsk, tsk, Dudly makes a LIE in that statement.

Another "mirror syndrome" activity of Dudly: Try to misdirect
by calling his challengers as "liars." Typical, but NOT a
"reply" to anything.



And Leonard H. Anderson has, once AGAIN, demonstrated that he is an
intentionally deceitful old putz who's weak minded, cowardly and
without any redeeming virtue.

Personal insults are NOT "replies."

If Dudly wants to be believed, he needs only to supply some
evidence of his claims. So far he has not done so, just
weasel-wording some generalities and giving alleged references
that cannot be obtained by the public. A DD-214 copy image
would be a start.



Just HOW does Mrs Lennie sleep in all that stench...?!?!

Putz.

Refraining from those constant personal insults would be another
good start in showing the world what an amateur extra class
license can be. So far, there hasn't been much good shown by
yourself as a "representative" "involved" "participating"
radio amateur.

Get some mental health counseling soon. It would benefit
everyone.