an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:14:28 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:
an old friend wrote:
you post a fraudulant apology and then you claim you did not post it
you don't get the truce that apology asked for
what you did is called theft by deception
It is ridiculous for you to assume that Steve made the post with an
offer of truce since he has never ever used such language in any post.
yhe has used worse language and uses simliar language often
No, I don't believe that he has.
so?
So it appears that you've told another in a long line of falsehoods.
futher the headers macth those of other posts by steve
No, Colonel, they do not.
certainly seem toin waht why are they defferent?
Why are they different? Because they *are* different.
he posted it
No, I don't believe he did.
prove it or let steve prove tit even better he refuses to even try by
his own standards that is a confession
Let Steve prove what? Why should I prove anything to you when you can
do it for yourself?
he used the langauge as a ruse
He used profane language to lull you into a false sense of security, did he?
no he used it to set up a situtaion if I ignored he flae on new fronts
if i acepted it he'd deviler this new attack
He'd do what to this new attack? You ignored he what?
What you did is called error, magnified by stupidity.
no it is called being tolerant magnafied by treachery
I explained what you did.
no you just lied some more trying to catch stev as the niggest liar on
RRAP
I'm trying to catch Steve as the what?
one of your biggest is the assertion you are a good christains
A good what?
another is that you are law abiding
Do you have evidence to the contrary, Colonel or is this just more
evidence of your descent into madness?
Dave K8MN