Thread
:
tnom's 1/4-wave whip design parameters
View Single Post
#
6
January 28th 06, 12:03 PM posted to rec.radio.cb
Frank Gilliland
Posts: n/a
tnom's 1/4-wave whip design parameters
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 02:59:50 -0500,
wrote in
:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 19:35:16 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:
Good design:
One inch silver pipe
Silver oxidizes when exposed to the elements, rendering it a poor
conductor in a very short time. Diameter is practically irrelevant at
the power levels we are discussing.
|-- top
|
|
|
| 102"
|
|
|
|-- bottom
Bad design:
Small diameter Stainless steel whip
Stainless steel doesn't oxidize (hence the qualifier "stainless"); and
while it's conductivity is less than that of silver (and the same is
true for chromium), both the diameter and power levels render any
differences insignificant in practical use.
|-- top
|
|
|
| 102"
|
|
|
|-- bottom
You can't make your point so you misrepresent. Like I said before.
You have never shown any reason for me to believe anything other
than you being dishonest.
I don't post test results that defy the laws of physics.
I have corrected your assumption.
You have corrected nothing -- your ideal design is impractical. A 1"
silver pipe? Yeah, that will work just dandy for a 102" mobile whip!
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com
The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Reply With Quote