Thread: 102" whip
View Single Post
  #87   Report Post  
Old January 28th 06, 02:54 PM posted to rec.radio.cb
 
Posts: n/a
Default 102" whip


What's my word based on? A test.


A test with anomalous results, no follow-up research and no
independent verification.


A test is better than no test.

What's your word based on?
Consensus?


Common sense and the laws of physics.


Consensus and incomplete laws of physics

But according to you, "we should
never trust the claim of others. You and me included."


No, I have corrected what I said and have repeatedly said you don't
have to believe me.


Uh-huh. How about correcting your test results instead?

If I changed the numbers that would be falsification. I'll leave that
response to you. You have it down pat.

So dig right
into "secondary and arguable" since it doesn't matter anyway -- what
makes a Rat Shack whip such a bad design?


I don't care what makes it bad. Do the test then you can hypothesize
as to why it didn't perform.



But I want -your- hypothesis, tnom.


Why the results?

You are not going to get a definitive answer from me, just conjecture.
Conjecturing with someone like you, a dishonorable person, is an
endless loop. All we need are the facts. Just the facts. Go get the
facts. Run the test and stop posturing.