Thread: 102" whip
View Single Post
  #94   Report Post  
Old January 28th 06, 07:22 PM posted to rec.radio.cb
Frank Gilliland
 
Posts: n/a
Default 102" whip

On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 09:54:29 -0500, wrote in
:


What's my word based on? A test.


A test with anomalous results, no follow-up research and no
independent verification.


A test is better than no test.



The Michelson-Morley experiment exposed that fallacy.


What's your word based on?
Consensus?


Common sense and the laws of physics.


Consensus and incomplete laws of physics



Anyone who has read my posts for the past few years knows that I'm not
a person who uses the ad populum fallacy. As for physics, you have an
open forum to explain the -complete- physics behind the two different
antennas. Go for it.


But according to you, "we should
never trust the claim of others. You and me included."

No, I have corrected what I said and have repeatedly said you don't
have to believe me.


Uh-huh. How about correcting your test results instead?

If I changed the numbers that would be falsification. I'll leave that
response to you. You have it down pat.



Where did I change your numbers, tnom? I am suggesting you make the
effort to research the reasons behind your results. The way it looks
now, you don't care about the reasons just as long as the results
agree with your opinion. That's not truth, tnom -- that's deception
(and it's a good thing you aren't selling these antennas because you
could be charged with the crime of misrepresentation and/or deceptive
business practices).


So dig right
into "secondary and arguable" since it doesn't matter anyway -- what
makes a Rat Shack whip such a bad design?

I don't care what makes it bad. Do the test then you can hypothesize
as to why it didn't perform.



But I want -your- hypothesis, tnom.


Why the results?

You are not going to get a definitive answer from me, just conjecture.
Conjecturing with someone like you, a dishonorable person, is an
endless loop. All we need are the facts. Just the facts. Go get the
facts. Run the test and stop posturing.



I made the offer. If your test results are indeed "facts" as you claim
then there should be no problem reimbursing my costs if my tests don't
achieve the same results. Well?








----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----