View Single Post
  #12   Report Post  
Old January 29th 06, 10:01 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
K4YZ
 
Posts: n/a
Default Here's An Interesting OPERATING Question for RRAPers

wrote:
On 28 Jan 2006 22:03:17 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:
On 28 Jan 2006 20:20:09 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
nobodys old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
Greetings All,

Are any of you equipped to work the ISS crossband repeater?
yes

Have any of you made contacts through it, or directly with NA1SS?
yes

Do any of you use NASA's
www.science.nasa.gov site to determine the
footprint?
no

now thatI have answer 3 of yours ahow about one of mine

what has the ISS to do with Policy issues?

It has to do with "policy" issues if it means getting RRAP'ers to
talk on the same frequency at the same time.

thin at best esp as I would not choose to be to be on the same freq as
you on any band at any time


Too bad for you then, Markie.


you must be delsuional to think I would want to talk to you, bad
enough dealing with you on RRap


I seriously doubt we'd ever be able to carry on a QSO regardless,
Markie...

I speak English fluently and some conversational German and
Spanish.

You speak jibberish.

Your "writing" on RRAP, where you have the opportunity to
proofread your content before sending it, is horriffic. I can only
imagine what it would be like on any of the realtime keyboard modes.

You're devoid of CW skill.

Therefore it's a foregone conclusion that we'll ever have a "QSO"
on the Amateur Bands in ANY mode, let alone via the ISS crossband
repeater.

but you avoid the issue of course


Acutally, Markie, YOU are the one on a divergent topic. I was
talking about ISS on Amateur Radio.

You pulled it into yet another trash thread as evidenced by your
retasking of the subject line to something other than the original
topic.

anything?

What does your question have to do with the first three?

why did it have to?


It didn't


then why did you ask that question


I don't believe that it's any of your business, Markie.

. But then THERE is where the "attack" you suggest comes
from...YOU!


no attack existed except in the mind of the oaranoid and micron thin
skin felow I am repling too


You're repling too? Did you repling also? What's
"repling"...?!?!

"oaranoid?"

Someone who doesn't like using manual propulsion in a bass boat?

indeed you are the most paranoid fellow I have ever seen


Perhaps. But your a perverted liar.

Between the two, I'll take paranoia.

any question is an attack


More random words in search of order, Markie. Try again.

but I questioned as s my rightthe relavance of the post

It's not your's to question.


yes it my place or anyone else that chooses


Not unless you care to state now for the record that you have
assumed moderatorship for RRAP, Markie.

Unless, of course, I missed the part
where a "moderator" was established for the NG?


I and anyone may question why something is posted


You may "question" anything you want.

However you're not entitled to an answer, mandatory or otherwise.

Anything?
everything
Or just can't stand seeing me talk about something OTHER
than you, eh?

nope I was curious something you discourage


Uhhhhhhhhhhh.....The whole THREAD was about being "curious",
Markie.


another the thread was about you indulging yours, no one is ever
allowed to be curious as you replies prove


E N G L I S H, Markie...

Thanks for once again demonstrating your ignorance on such a grand
scale.


what ignorance?


Yours.

In spades.

I certainly know what you up to


No you don't.

more diversion from your misdeeds


The diversion here is yours, Your Punkiness. I asked a legitimate
question about an Amateur Radio related event.

You pulled it into yet another slimefest in only 1 set of
exchanges.

Steve, K4YZ