On 29 Jan 2006 02:01:33 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:
On 28 Jan 2006 22:03:17 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:
On 28 Jan 2006 20:20:09 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
nobodys old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
Greetings All,
Are any of you equipped to work the ISS crossband repeater?
yes
Have any of you made contacts through it, or directly with NA1SS?
yes
Do any of you use NASA's www.science.nasa.gov site to determine the
footprint?
no
now thatI have answer 3 of yours ahow about one of mine
what has the ISS to do with Policy issues?
It has to do with "policy" issues if it means getting RRAP'ers to
talk on the same frequency at the same time.
thin at best esp as I would not choose to be to be on the same freq as
you on any band at any time
Too bad for you then, Markie.
you must be delsuional to think I would want to talk to you, bad
enough dealing with you on RRap
I seriously doubt we'd ever be able to carry on a QSO regardless,
Markie...
avoiding the issue I see
I speak English fluently and some conversational German and
Spanish.
You speak jibberish.
you know this How?
as far as I know you have never heard me speak
Your "writing" on RRAP, where you have the opportunity to
proofread your content before sending it, is horriffic.
so?
what has this got to do with my speaking?
I can only
imagine what it would be like on any of the realtime keyboard modes.
gee nobody has any real problem figuring out what i mean
You're devoid of CW skill.
this says somethign abotu my speaking abilty
I wish you had made this post when Cw testing was still the issue
Therefore it's a foregone conclusion that we'll ever have a "QSO"
on the Amateur Bands in ANY mode, let alone via the ISS crossband
repeater.
it is foregone becuase I would hear your call and brak off the contact
but you avoid the issue of course
Acutally, Markie, YOU are the one on a divergent topic. I was
talking about ISS on Amateur Radio.
you tuerned it into another antimark attack thread becuase I dared ask
what the ISS ars system had to do with RRAP
You pulled it into yet another trash thread as evidenced by your
retasking of the subject line to something other than the original
topic.
no I simply retetled the thread to reflect what you turned it into
anything?
What does your question have to do with the first three?
why did it have to?
It didn't
then why did you ask that question
I don't believe that it's any of your business, Markie.
i disgree it became my busness when you choose to turn this into
another antimark attack thread
. But then THERE is where the "attack" you suggest comes
from...YOU!
no attack existed except in the mind of the oaranoid and micron thin
skin felow I am repling too
You're repling too? Did you repling also? What's
"repling"...?!?!
"oaranoid?"
Someone who doesn't like using manual propulsion in a bass boat?
indeed you are the most paranoid fellow I have ever seen
Perhaps.
But your a perverted liar.
Between the two, I'll take paranoia.
any question is an attack
More random words in search of order, Markie. Try again.
but I questioned as s my rightthe relavance of the post
It's not your's to question.
yes it my place or anyone else that chooses
Not unless you care to state now for the record that you have
assumed moderatorship for RRAP, Markie.
again you deny that I have the same rights you do Robeson
i don't have to be the moderator to ask a question or comment on a
post you or anybody else makes on RRAP
Unless, of course, I missed the part
where a "moderator" was established for the NG?
I and anyone may question why something is posted
You may "question" anything you want.
then you lied a few line up you sted " Not unless you care to state
now for the record that you have assumed moderatorship for RRAP,
Markie." in response to "yes it my place or anyone else that chooses"
which was my response to"It's not your's to question."
indeed you just made the stament "It's not your's to question." a lie
unles you were lying just now when you typed "You may "question"
anything you want."
you have said in one thread that I am allowed to A and not allowed A
which ever stament is not true one of them is a lie and therfore you
are a Liar
However you're not entitled to an answer, mandatory or otherwise.
I never said I was
you OTOH have insited that you are entitled to answer
and therfore I belocome etitled to answer from YOU or to call you on
it when you refuse to meet your won standard
Anything?
everything
Or just can't stand seeing me talk about something OTHER
than you, eh?
nope I was curious something you discourage
Uhhhhhhhhhhh.....The whole THREAD was about being "curious",
Markie.
another the thread was about you indulging yours, no one is ever
allowed to be curious as you replies prove
E N G L I S H, Markie...
it is
Thanks for once again demonstrating your ignorance on such a grand
scale.
what ignorance?
Yours.
In spades.
I certainly know what you up to
No you don't.
sure do it is obvious
more diversion from your misdeeds
The diversion here is yours, Your Punkiness.
more name calling
I asked a legitimate
question about an Amateur Radio related event.
and I asked what it had to do with policy
You pulled it into yet another slimefest in only 1 set of
exchanges.
and therfore you claim despite saying I may ask question that I may
not ask any
Steve, K4YZ
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account