Reg:

Your simplistic analysis disagrees with my 50 years of operating local
contacts on 75 meters here in the southern US. Practical verticals are
universally 10 or more dB poorer than dipoles for local contacts, no matter
what the other variables. The very best quarter wave 66 foot vertical with
365 radials is about equivalent to a dipole lying on the ground for 0 to 250
mile contacts on 75. Forty meters performs a little closer to your
argument, but not much. Among long time local ragchewers, verticals are
considered to radiate equally poorly in all directions.

The NVIS nonsense also enters here. I have thrown back at the "proponents"
of NVIS that elevation angles of 45 degrees or less hardly qualify as NVIS
(properly NHIS, maybe?) but they continue to misuse common English to
further their specious arguments.

By the way, how much of the UK is within 500 miles of your QTH? I have to
exceed 500 miles just to get out of the state of Texas.

--
Crazy George
W5VPQ
My real address is my ham call atARRL.NET The ATTGlobal is a SPAM trap.
"Reg Edwards" wrote in message
...
There is much discussion about the relative merits of the simple
vertical versus horizontal dipole antennas.

Their radiation patterns are well known. They are very broad in both
the vertical and horizontal planes. Both have have a null.

We need consider only the broadside, maximum, radiation from a dipole.

Most of the arguments can be settled by considering the elevation
angle of the path taken by the radio wave between the transmitting and
receiving stations. Followed by a little elementary geometry or
trigonometry. For present purposes a flat Earth can be assumed.

At an elevation angle of around 45 degrees the strength of radiation
received from vertical and horizontal antennas are about equal. (This
has nothing to do with Eznec take-off angles.)

The heights of the Ionospheric reflecting layers are -

E-layer = 70 miles, daylight only.
F1-layer = 140 miles, occasionally, in daylight only.
F2-layer = 190 miles, night-time.
F2-layer = 250 miles, in daylight.

From flat-Earth geometry, at an elevation angle of 45 degrees, the
distance between transmitting and receiving stations is twice the
height of the reflecting layer. Therefore, at this distance the
received signal strength can be expected to be about the same from
both types of antenna.

As the elevation angle decreases, the distance increases and radiation
from the vertical antenna increases. The radiation from the dipole
decreases. There is an extra propagation loss due to an increase in
radio path length but this equally affects radiation from both antenna
types.

As the elevation angle increases towards the vertical, distance
decreases, radiation from the dipole increases and radiation from the
vertical antenna decreases in strength. The radio path loss decreases
but the difference in pattern between the two antenna types is
maintained at the receiver.

With a spherical Earth, in daylight, using the F2-layer, at elevation
angles around 5 degrees, one-hop distances of 3,500 miles can occur.
With two hops, at angles of around 12 degrees, distances of 5,000
miles can occur.

For each additional hop there is loss in the layer and loss in the
reflection in the ground. Some parts of the radio path may be in
daylight and others in darkness. More than one layer may be involved.
Muli-path distortion occurs. Peculiar things happen and much depends
on frequency.

The low-angle performance of a half-wave dipole, even when radiating
broadside towards the receiver, is very poor in comparison with a
simple vertical.

On the other hand, a simple vertical does reasonably well when working
just across county because of the short propagation path, almost
straight up and down again, or even via the groundwave for very short
distances.
----
Reg, G4FGQ.