On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 15:43:38 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

+On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 20:38:52 GMT, james wrote
+in :
+
+On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:45:27 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:
+
++On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 19:53:40 GMT, james wrote
++in :
++
++On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 19:49:53 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:
++
+++
+++Sifting back through the thread it appears that you began this
+++disagreement with an obtuse remark. To wit:
++****
++
++In my opinion I do not feel that any of my remarks were out of line or
++harsh. Like I said, if they did seem that way they were not intended
++to be so.
++
++james
++
++
++I believe 'obtuse' was the wrong word...... it should have been
++'disjuctive'.
++
++
+*****
+
+Did you mean disjunctive?
+
+james
+
+
+No, I meant 'disjuctive': a barely relevant act, response, opinion,
+etc, made in a vain attempt to demonstrate superior intellect. A good
+example would be when someone plays spelling cop instead of addressing
+the topic of the discussion.
+
+Did I make myself clear? Or is there something -else- you don't
+undrstand?
+
*****

No, just at first look I did not see the word "disjuctive" in a
dictinary.

Sorry for any inconvience.

james