RadioBanter - View Single Post

March 8th 06, 12:29 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna

wrote:
That doesn't sound like Walter gave you permission to me.

Tom, I can't believe you have the balls to lie about such a thing
when it is so easy to prove otherwise. Your behavior is unbelievably
unethical. I simply cannot believe you are willing to go to these
lengths to satisfy that insatiable ego of yours.

W5DXP asks Walt:
And Walt, would you mind if I add just your following comments
to the thread on qrz.com and credit them to you? I trimmed out
any reference to me or Tom.

Walter Maxwell earlier wrote:
If an inductance is in series with a line that has no reflections,
the current will be the same at both ends of the inductor.

If an inductance is in series with a line that has reflections,
the current will NOT be the same at both ends of the inductor.

Consequently, circuit analysis will not work when both forward
and reflected currents are present in a lumped circuit.

Walter Maxwell replied to the request:
Fine with me, Cecil, but you might also add the point about the loop
and node appearing simultanously when reflections are present--sorta
puts the icing on the cake.

Walt

Tom, not only did Walt give me permission, he pointed out something
that I had left out.

You are being unbelievably unethical. You could have handled this
in a private email to me but you are apparently willing to drag
Walter Maxwell through the mud in order to spread your old wives'
tales. Good grief, will you stop at nothing? I'm going to have to
sign off and cool down.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp