Roy Lewallen wrote:
wrote:
The problem with people doing work to verify this is even if several
people measure something, Cecil will ignore results.
Indeed. Or alter his interpretation to fit the data.
I can't help but point out that you guys are refusing to engage
me in any technical discussion and refusing to respond to my
technical quotes. All you do is engage in desperate ad hominem
attacks hoping that your guru status will prevail. That's a pretty
good indication that you have already lost the technical argument
and know it.
--
73, Cecil
http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp