Telamon wrote:

I for one would appreciate it if the political nut cases would stick
to the off topic flame threads or start their own thread.

Whatever wrote:

Time for some irony and hypocrisy. Just a small sample.
http://tinyurl.com/pz8do

In article ,
"Carter, K8VT" wrote:

Very interesting...320 posts, almost all of them political per se, not
complaints about OT posts. (Sorry, didn't have time to read all 320, but
the ones I did read *clearly* demonstrated the irony).

I think "hypocrisy" defines our boy up on his high horse quite well. Yet
another example of "Do as I say, not as I do".

Telamon wrote:

You and whatever have a high number of off posts. You and whatever
generally do not post helpful replies to questions. You and whatever can
point back to a period of time during a contentious election and that's
it for me but you and whatever are a different story. Do continue
looking like a clueless jackass as you do in most of your posts.


As you *still* don't get it, *you* appear to be the "clueless jackass".
So let me try one last attempt to explain it...

You say I have "a high number of off [sic] posts".

My news reader shows me that I have a *total* of approximately 146
posts on this NG, some off and some on topic. The other poster
(Whatever) clearly provided *proof* that *you* have 320 posts, virtually
ALL off topic.

Before you start slinging around accusations at others about "high
numbers" of OT posts, you may want to look in the mirror (and check
your calculator). Last time I looked, 320 is a bigger number than a
portion of 146.

Furthermore, your weak excuse/rationalization/justification for those
320 posts was because they were about "a contentious election". SO
WHAT??? OT is OT, contentious or not. Are you saying *YOU* are the only
one that can respond to contentious political posts and then whine and
chastise others for doing the EXACT SAME THING that you have done? And
do you think "contentious" is a justification for you alone? Have you
considered, for example, that the war many post about may be
"contentious" to them? Again, your stunning hypocrisy is shining brightly!

Others here have every right to exercise the same right to post that you
did 320 times.

Sorry, but at this end of the circuit, you are *still* coming through
loud and clear as a self-centered H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-T-E !

To summarize, if you think a portion of 146 is a larger number of OT
posts than your 320 and if you think "contentious" is an OT
justification reserved only for you alone, then *you* are truly the
"clueless jackass"...