Cecil,

Sorry, Ian had it exactly correct. I cannot speak for Roy or others, but
I am quite sure I did not take any "side" in this topic. I believe in
lumped circuit models, and I believe in network models. My aim was to
try to correct some of the basic math and physics flaws, not to argue
over the exact regimes of applicability for lumped and non-lumped models.

If you choose to use my postings as support for your "side", so be it.

At the same time, if proving your "side" includes mobile antennas with
48 foot whips and giant bugcatcher coils working at three times their
self-resonant frequency, then please leave me off of your "side".

73,
Gene
W4SZ

Cecil Moore wrote:
wrote:

Cecil claims I'm the ONLY one who disagrees with him!


False! Gene Fuller, Tom Donaly, and Roy Lewallen have all made
postings that support my side of the argument against yours.
That doesn't mean they agree with me 100%. They agree with me
on some technical things that are not in dispute except by you.