Telamon wrote:
In article ,
"Carter, K8VT" wrote:

Telamon wrote:
I for one would appreciate it if the political nut cases
would stick to the off topic flame threads or start their
own thread.
Whatever wrote:
Time for some irony and hypocrisy. Just a small sample.
http://tinyurl.com/pz8do
In article ,
"Carter, K8VT" wrote:
Very interesting...320 posts, almost all of them political per
se, not complaints about OT posts. (Sorry, didn't have time to
read all 320, but the ones I did read *clearly* demonstrated
the irony).

I think "hypocrisy" defines our boy up on his high horse quite
well. Yet another example of "Do as I say, not as I do".
Telamon wrote:

You and whatever have a high number of off posts. You and
whatever generally do not post helpful replies to questions. You
and whatever can point back to a period of time during a
contentious election and that's it for me but you and whatever
are a different story. Do continue looking like a clueless
jackass as you do in most of your posts.

As you *still* don't get it, *you* appear to be the "clueless
jackass". So let me try one last attempt to explain it...

Snip

I'm not a hypocrite. I contribute a lot of on topic and helpful posts
to this news group and I don't feel the need to justify my posting
history to someone with your poor posting history.

First, sorry to drag this thread on, but you still don't seem to get it.

Next, maybe you do need to justify your posting history as this is
really at the heart of the debate...

* you accused and chastised me (and others) of a "high number" of OT posts.

* 'Whatever' called your bluff, did some research and caught *you* with
your pants down--*320* OT posts (while I have of 146 posts total, maybe
100 OT). That would seem to make *you* the winner of the "High Number"
award, not others. Sort of like a guy with 320 traffic tickets calling a
guy with 100 tickets a bad driver.

* When you accuse people of doing something wrong and then it comes to
pass that *you* have done the same "wrong" thing almost *three* times as
often, then, yes, you *should* justify your posting history or be
exposed for the hypocrite you are.

As to your trying to justify your 320 OTs because you post on topic
also--well, that's a little like a bank robber saying it's OK to rob
banks because he gives some of the money to charity. NOT! OT is OT and
your 320 trumps my 100. Period [.]

so into the kill file with you.

Plonk

Thought I was already there(!) but, please, do so again. It's getting
too hard to follow your illogic, denials, dodging, weaseling and bogus
"justification" of *YOUR* 320 OTs.