On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:51:43 -0600, "Dr.Death"
wrote in
:

snip for brevity
Ok. Please Frank may I see your evidence?
That better?


Not really. You have already made your judgment regarding my
statement. Now you are only begging me to present my argument to
attack it.


If you remember
correctly, you prejudged me last year by stating I was an unemployed
alcoholic based on the times of my post. YOU have prejudged me.


Was that before or after I provided helpful advice to you on power
supply filter caps? IC datasheets? Field strength meters? Oh, wait,
here it is:

http://tinyurl.com/h8j6z

That is not full trhead Frank. No mention of cell or amp. But then why would
you Google up anything that would prove my statement?


........uh, is that a trick question?


Oh well, doesn't really matter -- your posts and their times are a
matter of record, as are your excuses.


And for the record, since you check my time card so well, I took the day off
to celebrate my anniversery.


That accounts for -one- day out of the year..... 364 days to go.


snip
How can you be so sure? Were you somehow privy to Bush's program of
illegally wiretapping American citizens? If not (and that includes the
vast majority of Americans, even the paranoids) then you simply have
no idea what they know..... or how they know it.


I have a social security number. That's how I know for a fact that they keep
some record of me.


So how does that translate into "I know for a fact that the NSA does
NOT have records of any amp purchased by me"?


snip
You still can't grasp this 'prejudice' thing yet, can you? It's a
simple concept..... -really- simple. For example, your recent post
chastising someone you don't even know for being a "racist pig" is, by
definition, prejudicial. Here's a link that might help fill one of the
enormous gaps in your education:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prejudice


Obviously you did not read the post or the header. If you did then you just
do not have a clue.


Obviously you did not read the link I provided. If you did then you
just do not have any critical thinking skills.


snip
Pretty soon it will be Master of Electrical Engineering..... work has
been slow since the statewide smoking ban so I decided to go back to
school.

Congrats on going back to school. (yes I can compliment also)
How does the smoking ban affect your job? I thought you worked in
electronics, though I may be incorrect on that.


I've been slopping drinks at the local pub since the station was
assimilated by ClearChannel of Borg.


BTW, the Gillinad thing is old and stale. How about using some of that
imagination and call me names that are at least creative and original?


Seems to fit you.


So does my vintage, silver satin Seahawks jacket (which is still for
sale, BTW).


"He stated, and I quote 'If you cannot get a cell signal you are
unable to talk on 11m with 100 watts.'"

So I replied by asking you to cite your 'quote' but you hid behind
your killfile excuse. I then changed my username to bypass your
killfile and still no response; even when, according to you in the
same thread, "...I have Frank on my killfile list and I still have to
read his bull****."

Because it was quoted in other posts. Try again fool.


Yes, the stupid argument that was cross posted about military service
dumbass.


You'll have to cite that one, too.


Markie cross posted a fresh one just today. You and Steve going at it about
military service.


......ok, so what's your excuse? That you couldn't reply to my question
because you -could- read my posts?


http://tinyurl.com/ckvhb

You need to Google back to the original thread from last year.
YOU try again asswipe.


I have written a lot of posts over the years, and since this appears
to be an issue you can't dismiss through therapy, why don't you be a
little more specific about which discussion it is that's retarding
your emotional development?


There we go again. Making assumptions based on nothing. Isn't this the kind
of **** you accuse me of?


I'll simplify it for you: Where's the post?


snip
Google it up. You posted it last year in the same thread that you accused
me
of being a drunk.


Earlier in this post I provided the link to the referenced thread.
Nowhere in there do I see anything radio related, let alone the quote
you cited. And if you had checked the link I provided in the previous
post (the thread where you create ridiculous situations to justify
using an amp on the CB) you would see nothing from me about your
posting habits -or- your alcoholism. Is there yet -another- thread
that is disrupting your mental stability?


It was the same thread. I believe it started with you stating there is no
reason to ever break the law, which we all know is nonsense.


I have never said that there is no reason to -ever- break the law. I
-did- say that you have provided no valid reason to break the law we
were discussing. And you still haven't. If you want to be a lawbreaker
that's up to you. If you want to brag about it, fine. But making lame
excuses is what little kids do when they get caught with their hands
in the cookie jar. If you had any balls you would just say, "Hey, I'm
doin' it just because I want to." But apparently honesty is not one of
your virtues.


I only quoted you.


No, you didn't. You paraphrased something I said, completely out of
the context in which it was written, and tried to pass it to the group
as verbatim.


Then Google up the original thread and prove me wrong. You won't because
you
know you were talking out your ass.


I already did. If you are referring to a different thread then maybe
it's time for you to start doing your -own- homework.


You stated it. You go hunting.


Have you even -tried- to go to the link I posted? In case your web
browser isn't working, it is the result page for a google search on
the quote. The result is that the first time the line was ever posted
on Usenet was by you when you misquoted me. Now are you going to act
stupid and continue to beg me to prove you wrong when I already did?
Or are you really that stupid?


snip
If I search hard enough I'm sure I can find anything, but you are
deviating
from what you originaly posted.


Well, instead of quoting what I -didn't- say, how about quoting what I
-did- say? Is that too much of a challenge?


You said I was killfiled. You lied. Not a challange at all.


Yeah? So? Are you disappointed that I had the willpower to ignore most
of your posts without a killfile, while at the same time you were
getting all upset about being force-fed my posts even after you put me
in -your- killfile? Or do you feel that you were fraudulently denied
the last word in an argument? Either way, if you have been harboring
this grudge for a whole year, don't you think it's time to seek some
professional help? Good god, man..... get some perspective.


....or were you just making more excuses?


Don't need too, you make enough excuses for the both of us and then some.


What excuses? If I said it then I'll admit it. But so far you haven't
shown me where I said anything like what you are claiming. All you
have done so far is make accusations based on gross misquotations and
hatred, then telling me to google it to prove you wrong. Well, I did.

So I'll get back to my original question -- the same question that has
been on the burner for several months now without an answer: In what
post did I state, "If you cannot get a cell signal you are unable to
talk on 11m with 100 watts"?


Look it up. Your memory is slipping from all the lies you post.


Same old excuse.