"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006 10:32:08 -0400, "Yuri Blanarovich"
wrote:

Now consider larger
error from the wrong assumption or calculation caused by wrong current
magnitudes and distribution.

Hi Yuri,

Why is it that you can say this so often, and yet never put a number
to it?


Experience, my dear, experience.
If I am capabl;e of writing to you, I don't have to put number on it, how
many letters of alphabet I master.

What is the error? You also speak of efficiency. What is the
efficiency?

Stick in the EZNEC and find out if you can't sleep without numbers.
Anyone who looks at current distribution curves can see that there is a
difference. No need for lawyers and precise numbers. If only this was the
problem, then I would give you answer to 4 decimal places. You have greater
problem with "gurus" not getting the big picture (or pretending to).

Very simple questions. Technically based. Selected because they seem
to be of supreme importance to you, and yet you don't seem to have a
handle on the situation.

I have the handle on it, appreciate the magnitude and with time there will
be some numbers.
Cecil posted files, anyone who is hang up on numbers can get them from the
EZNEC if properly defined, instead of poking needles.
We are having problem with people admitting there could be difference in the
current across loading coils, and here the "problems" is what is the error?

So lets stick to the big problem and fuggettabout detours and nitpicking.

Yuri, K3BU

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC