Gene Fuller wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:

I've posted the EZNEC results a
number of times and none of the "experts" have responded.

Cecil,
I wonder why?
Fool me once, shame on you.
Fool me twice, shame on me.
Fool me thrice, what an idiot I must be.

Gene, I don't make fools of the "experts". They do
that to themselves through such statements as
"current is current", implying that standing wave
current is identical to traveling wave current which
you know is NOT the case (thanks for your earlier
posting).

Wouldn't it be better to explain standing wave current
to the "experts" in a private email than attacking me
here for "fooling the experts"? You and I are in
essential agreement. It's the "experts" who use
standing wave current phase to measure phase who
are, in your words above, the "idiots".

Considering a technical discussion to be fooling the
"experts" speaks volumes, doesn't it? And indeed,
Ian said it best. He said something to the effect that
I try to sucker the experts into an argument when I
am right. That says it all and shows why the "experts"
won't engage me when they know that they are wrong.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp