wrote:
I'm still trying to find out why my meter measures standing wave
current and not "real current", or whatever the heck he is saying.

It's all explained by the EZNEC data that I have posted half a
dozen times before to which you haveyet to responded. In case
you could possibly have missed it, here it is again:

% along current in current in
wire #2 TravWave.EZ StndWave.EZ

0.28% 0.9998 at -0.99 deg 0.9996 at 0 deg
9.72% 0.9983 at -9.39 deg 0.9843 at -0.03 deg
19.7% 0.9969 at -18.23 deg 0.9454 at -0.05 deg
30.3% 0.9957 at -27.59 deg 0.8843 at -0.06 deg
39.7% 0.9949 at -35.96 deg 0.8023 at -0.08 deg
49.7% 0.9945 at -44.84 deg 0.7014 at -0.09 deg
60.3% 0.9945 at -54.20 deg 0.5840 at -0.09 deg
69.7% 0.9949 at -62.58 deg 0.4528 at -0.10 deg
79.7% 0.9956 at -71.43 deg 0.3110 at -0.11 deg
89.7% 0.9965 at -80.27 deg 0.1616 at -0.11 deg
99.7% 0.9976 at -89.14 deg 0.0061 at -0.11 deg

I have graphed these EZNEC results and they are available at:

http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/travstnd.GIF

The corresponding EZNEC files are available at:

http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/TravWave.EZ
http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/StndWave.EZ

Would you please explain why you are avoiding these results
which expose your misconceptions about standing wave current
unless exposing your misconceptions is what you are avoiding?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp