Cecil Moore wrote:


Roy, maybe you need to learn the definition of "roughly".
It is certainly not "exactly" as you are clutching at straws
to imply. Why you need to change the definitions of words
is obvious from your flawed arguments. Exactly what is
it about "roughly" that you don't understand?

Cecil,

Is 10 degrees of phase shift "roughly" equal to 75 degrees of phase
shift? I don't think anyone is trying to nit-pick the numbers to a
precision of several significant figures. A multiple of greater than 7
would seem to be just a bit outside the scope of "roughly".

73,
Gene
W4SZ