Thanks for the suggestion Baldy.


On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:31:54 GMT, Carter-K8VT
wrote:

junius wrote:

I've called MFJ before and asked if there was much of a difference
between the 1045C and the 1020C active antenna. From appearances, they
seem much alike, with the exception of the fact that the 1020C has
coverage from 0.3 to 40 MHz and includes a whip, while the 1045C has
coverage from 1 to 54 MHz and no whip. From what I was told by the MFJ
fellow, it's advisable to get the 1020C if you're primarily wanting an
active antenna, but that if you're specifically needing a preselector,
the 1045C better performs this function (well, I guess that's why one
is marketed as an active antenna and the other a preselector, huh?)


If you'd like to see the actual differences between the two units, I
suggest you go to the MFJ web site and download the free .pdf manual for
each.

http://www.mfjenterprises.com/manuals.php


It’s Christianity vs. Islam. Let’s get this party started!

Do u want a excellent usenet filter?
Then add these folks to yours.
---------------------------------
mII
Dave Stinson
John Barnard
Greg
David
Peter Wieck
Steven Dinius
Sylvain Vanier