View Single Post
  #12   Report Post  
Old October 2nd 03, 12:57 AM
Reg Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default


For given location of loading coil along a short antenna wire, of given
overall length, of given wire, rod or mast diameter, the following programs
will calculate the inductance needed to resonate it to 1/4-wavelength.


Two loaded wires connected back-to-back form a 1/2-wave resonant dipole.


Program ADDALOAD will tell just that. It will also tell you the value and
position of a loading capacitance if antenna length requires a resonating
capacitor.


Program LOADCOIL will do likewise and also tell you how many turns of what
gauge wire to wind on a coil of given former length and diameter.


Program VERTLOAD does a similar job insofar as dipoles are concerned.


Program MIDLOAD is dedicated to very short centre-loaded dipoles. All coil
and wire dimensions and number of turns are taken into account. Such
antennas can be fed via either coax or balanced-pair feedlines of any
impedance.


Program SOLNOID2 will design any coil of any proportions for any given
dimensions and required inductance, plus a variety of other performance
characteristics including temperature rise for given applied RF volts. Nice
for tank coils, loading coils and antenna traps.


All these programs are used in a "What-if " user-friendly mode. USA
citizens may be at a slight disadvantage - metric measurement units are
used although in some cases a translation is provided. Once one of these
simple loaded anennas has been designed, provided you have a BIG,
UNOBSTRUCTED back-yard, EZNEC may be used to estimate its receiving and
radiating pattern. Otherwise your guess is as good as mine.


However, it should be borne in mind, a coil-loaded short antenna is
essentially a single-band device and a tuner is nearly always needed even
for the single band. With a tuner it may be goaded into doing something
useful on one or two higher frequency bands.


For optimum efficiency the location of a loading coil is about 2/3 or 3/4 of
the way along the wire length. The bigger the physical size of the loading
coil, the higher the Q, the smaller the coil loss and the nearer it can be
placed towards the end of the wire. But location is VERY non-critical.


If the wire is not very much shorter than self-resonance then efficiency can
be maximised by NOT inserting a coil in the wire and depending entirely on a
high-impedance balanced transmission line and a tuner. Without a
high-in-the-air loading coil the antenna reverts advantageously to multiband
operation.


In general, good efficiency is possible with a 450 or 600-ohm feed-line
provided the overall length of an unloaded dipole is not less than 0.3
wavelengths at the lowest frequency of interest.


One antenna with its feedline, from coax to open wire, or both types in
tandem, can be compared efficiency-wise with another by using program
DIPOLE3.


All the above small programs, one self-contained file only, can be
downloaded in a few seconds from the following website and run immediately.
No training course needed. Free to USA citizens. ;o)

----
=======================
Regards from Reg, G4FGQ
For Free Radio Design Software
made in the original Birmingham,
go to http://www.g4fgq.com
=======================