Cecil Moore wrote:
wrote:
I never said 1.0, as a matter of fact the coil I measured had a vF
(when compared to physical length) of about .5
Sorry, that's still about 1000% too high, still completely out
of the ballpark. What I suspect is that you measured zero delay
through the coil and reported 3 nS because you knew zero was
obviously wrong.
Sorry Cecil, I cannot get into my network analyzer and make it show a
delay on a printout that isn't actually there. I push the button, it
prints the data it takes.
In an attempt to justify your odd conclusions, you are now altering my
measurements.
At this point any further exchange is useless, because you have now
resorted to calling the other person a liar when measured data
disagrees with your preconcieved notions.
I'm done with you.