--
SeeYaa
Harbin Osteen KG6URO
This is YOUR futu
http://halturnershow.com/aztlan_caps.wmv
http://media.putfile.com/La-Gran-Marcha
The Mexican Solution:
http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.o...s&code=06-D_18
-
"Dave" wrote in message news
stananger wrote:
May 1st 2006, Civil War Begins
On May 1st 2006 The "Great American Boycott" also known as the "Day without
immigrants" is scheduled to occur. Participant's stated goals are a general
strike, No Work, No School, No Sales, and No Buying. These people want to
shut down individual cities, all across the nation, thereby impacting the
country as a whole.
SNIPPED
terˇrorˇism -"The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a
person or an organized group against people or property with the intention
of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological
or political reasons." - American HeritageŽ Dictionary of the English
Language, Fourth Edition
SNIPPED
It is not terrorism per your quoted definition: "terˇrorˇism -"The UNLAWFUL [emphasis added] use or threatened use of force or
violence ... "
I don't see any UNLAWFUL activity here. If you want a day off you take a day off. If ten people want a day off, they take a day
off. If 100 people want a day off, they take a day off. ...
Is it unlawful for citizens from another country to protest in our streets, and attempt
to manipulate our economy? I don't know, but it should be.
The opening words of the USA Constitution are extremely important. "We the PEOPLE ..." Note: it does not say Citizens.
I do think it implies citizenship.
The First Amendment to the USA Constitution states:
"Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or
abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government
for a redress of grievances."
The peoples government, implies citizenship.
The protest is fully compliant with " freedom of speech", "peaceably to assemble' and to "redress of grievances"
The Constitutional Rights you demand for yourself MUST be Rights for those with whom you disagree.
Does this apply to laws we demand for ourselves?
--
SeeYaa
Harbin Osteen KG6URO
This is YOUR futu
http://halturnershow.com/aztlan_caps.wmv
http://media.putfile.com/La-Gran-Marcha
The Mexican Solution:
http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.o...s&code=06-D_18
-