On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 05:29:24 -0700, Bill Turner
wrote:

On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 10:43:43 -0400, "KWM442X" wrote:

ARRL, of by and for the former CB and now ham
appliance operator.

ARRL, a dying organization, whose officials will grab all
the money they can before ARRL finally goes belly up.

ARRL loves suckers who keep mailing in membership
dues to a do nothing orgainization to line the pockets of
ARRL officials.

ARRL, an organization that screws ham operators at
every turn, if it means putting another dime in the pocket
of ARRL officials.


Send your dues in suckers!

_________________________________________________ ________

The quality of trolling on this newsgroup is getting worse every day.
What can be done to improve it? Troll schools? Troll certification?
Troll Elmers? What????

I agree. It's way too easy to become a troll these days. Back in the
old days, you had to learn DOS commands first. None of this
point-and-click crap that's so easy even a child could do it, you had
to learn how to type, you had to learn about filenames and extensions,
you had to learn how to use a keyboard. Today's trolls are spoiled
because all they have to do is click their little mouse. Windows is
going to be the end of trolling as we know it, mark my words. They
ought to bring back DOS. That's what separated the real McCoys from
the wanna-be's back in the good old days - DOS.

Besides, what happens in an emergency? Your computer crashes and
Windows won't boot, you need to know DOS in order to get in there and
fix it. These trolls of today don't know squat about DOS, and when
they end up trashing their Windows they have to haul their computer
off to a club meeting to get a REAL troll to fix it. DOS works when
nothing else will work, that's why they should never have gotten rid
of it. Windows just made the Apple and Commodore riffraff from years
ago think they are real computer users. Bring back DOS and let 'em all
go back to their Commode Door 64 where they belong.

73 de John, KC2HMZ, Tonawanda, NY

Disclaimer: Any apparent similarity to the code/no-code argument is
pure coincidence and is completely unintentional.