FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT!
Cecil Moore wrote:
Gene Fuller wrote:
Why would anyone try to prove that the basic math of adding sinusoidal
functions is incorrect? To the contrary, you are the one who insists
that a standing wave and its constituent traveling wave components are
somehow different and unique.
Actually, it was you who made that assertion and thanks for the
opportunity to quote you once again:
Gene Fuller, W4SZ wrote:
In a standing wave antenna problem, such as the one you describe,
there is no remaining phase information. Any specific phase
characteristics of the traveling waves died out when the startup
transients died out.
So standing waves are "somehow different" from traveling waves
according to your own assertions. The traveling wave possesses
phase characteristics and the standing wave doesn't.
Cecil,
You keep making the same mistake. Yes, you can analyze traveling waves
instead of standing waves if you so choose. However, there is not one
bit of additional physical information in the traveling waves that is
not in the standing wave. Any "phase characteristic" is simply a
function of the mathematical manipulations you use.
Perhaps someday you will actually understand superposition, but I won't
hold my breath.
73,
Gene
W4SZ
|