"Gene Fuller" wrote in message
...
Cecil Moore wrote:
Gene Fuller wrote:

Cecil, You still don't get it.
I get what you said. Here it is again.
So you alluded
I meant it.
But you also said:
there is not one bit of additional physical information
So for your statement to be true, there has to be Both of your statements
cannot be true. Which one are you
willing to stick with and which one are you going to retract?
If you look at
I'm sorry, but you have contradicted yourself a couple of times
so I don't know which assertion you want to go with.
I have not contradicted myself, and I have nothing to retract. but that is
another topic.
I am not sure to whom the "we" refers in your statement,
Perhaps that is the Royal We, because it certainly does not include me.
there is no additional available from

COME ON! KEEP IT GOING!! this rainy wet weekend is almost over and I could
use one more good round of laughter!! Perhaps we cut straight to the
conclusion and have something that is completely a personal attack devoid of
any possible technical statements, that would do nicely! DON'T STOP NOW!