View Single Post
  #186   Report Post  
Old May 23rd 06, 05:41 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Roy Lewallen
 
Posts: n/a
Default FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT!

Cecil Moore wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote:
. . .
Richard quoted me correctly. I did *NOT* quote you. I merely
stated what I thought you said.

Cecil calls the total current the "standing wave current".



That is absolutely false. Total current equals standing wave
current plus traveling wave current. Or standing wave current
equals total current minus traveling wave current. Subtract
out the traveling wave component and a pure standing wave
component is left.


I could have sworn Cecil had used it in that sense before. But Ok, I'll
go along with the new definition. Any basic analysis of transmission
line operation shows that the total current is simply the sum of the
traveling wave currents. Consequently the "standing wave current" as
defined by Cecil is zero. So by "standing wave current", Cecil means zero.

This is getting stranger by the day.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL