RadioBanter - View Single Post

May 24th 06, 06:44 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna

On Tue, 23 May 2006 23:01:52 -0500, (Richard
Harrison) wrote:

Richard Clark wrote:
"Demanding that "new frequencies" must exist AND then saying that they
must be of such-and-such a magnitude to qualify is a hoot."

Glad you got a kick out of that. It is not original.

Hi Richard,

All that was missing from your response was the chuckle, and the
number at which distortion begins.

How is it if you are not laughing, that neither are you illuminating
to this specific point that is presumable a serious issue? Such a
shortfall doesn't inspire much confidence in your logic, which perhaps
sank with that concrete life jacket.

C'mon, is 10% distortion to be mandated as linear, and 11% distortion
non-linear? Need we push this to Cecil's Limit of perception - ±59%?

Choose your own numbers, or find a true authority to quote a
quantitative response.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC