On a sunny day (Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:34:57 GMT) it happened Bob Dobbs EC42
wrote in pan.2006.06.12.23.34.54.717000@Quetzalcoatl:

On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 18:34:51 +0000, Jan Panteltje wrote:

There is in fact no need for the 'other' sideband in DSB-SC, no problem
if the receiver filters it out, that is why you can receive DSB-SC both
with USB and LSB!

Without both sidebands, it would no longer be DSB, and the reason stations
use DSB instead of SSB is for the use of ordinary receivers that lack a
BFO.

How about providing a source of those 'undetectable" DSBSC signals that
one might encounter within or nearby to the CB band, instead of some
technobabble with irrelevant circuitry illustrations?

OK for the last time before you enter my killfile:
DSB is not AM. AM is AM, and AM has both sidebands, but when we say 'DSB we mean DSB-SC.
idiot