RadioBanter - View Single Post

wrote:
Hi all,
I once believed that UHF(and beyond) RF electronics was the most
technically challenging hobby there is. Period.
However, I've since read about some chap who claims his principal
'hobby' is Quantum Mechanics! This fellow is in prison somewhere in the
UK and all his 'work' is *entirely* theoretical (obviously - given the
confined circumstances) and consists of the academic pursuit of the
subject alone including heaps of serious number-crunching and
formidably cryptic calculus.
The complex, metaphysical conundrum that arises from this is: can QM
(highly theoretical even if you actually work hands-on with particle
accelerators) ever be accurately described as a 'hobby?'
What does the Panel think?
p.

Andy writes:

I think that talking incessantly about a subject that one can't
prove by demonstration shows an inferiority complex. The dude is
afraid to argue a subject whose results can be proven....

Just like arguing Catholicism versus Buddha --- an interesting
way , for some, to waste their time. But no way to be proven
wrong.......

If the fellow's mind was as good as the fellow seems to think
it is , himself, he wouldn't be afraid to approach subjects where
he could be shown in error.....

I bet the SOB has never changed the oil in his own truck.....I bet
if he tried, he would mess it up.....

Andy in Eureka, Texas