I don't have time to engage in ****ing contests.
There are some people here who "argue" that something is not so, because
they have a theory that "it can't be".
Most of my arguments or descriptions are based on reality that I or others
observed and can be duplicated. If you or anyone doesn't believe in them,
you can duplicate them and see for yourself. I will gladly provide details.
I am not employed or reporting to this esteemed RRAA NG, so it is at the end
of my list of priorities.
Some of the misconceptions are duly noted and in due time, when I have time
to sit down and write it up, I will do so.
The point is, that if Cecil has seen sparks coming from his coax under clear
AZ skies, or I have seen that small loop antenna shield DOES suppress local
interference - measured, seen, experienced - than arguing by scientwists is
just foolish, if not pathetic.
Who's "credibility" are we then talking about?
I do not proclaim to be a scientist who spent tax dollars investigating
phenomena and formulating rock solid theories as why. I am more of real
engineer, who when sees some erroneous stuff posted, and I know it to be
otherwise, I say my piece.
Isn't it interesting that real engineers get hammered on tangents by
scientwists who are wrong and are trying to justify their "truth" by some
mumbo-jumbo and obfuscating the real subject? If that's what turns them on,
than they can have a field day with it.

"It'll sure beat the tired, old attempts at sarcasm you're always posting
here"
Oh, that's what it is!?

73
Yuri Blanarovich, K3BU, VE3BMV


"Tom Donaly" wrote in message
. net...
Yuri Blanarovich wrote:

"Tom Donaly" wrote

There's no such thing as a clear-sky charged-particle problem, either
in the Arizona desert or anywhere else. Naming isn't proving. You're
going to have people blaming their arcing problems on pure fantasy.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH



Ahm,
like there are no molecules of air being moved by the wind and rubbing on
conductive parts?
When part is not grounded, it will not accumulate the charge?
If the charge exceeds dielectric strength of the insulator (connector),
the discharge in form of spark would not happen?
Like ariplanes do not accumulate charge when flying? Or my 72 Buick?
Like Cecil is completely off the rocker making stuff up just to make
himself look foolish? Hmmmmmm!
Too much funny stuff going on here from scientwific community. :-)

Yuri K3BU

Would you like to tell me how airplanes accumulate charge, Yuri? Would you
like to give me the results of the experiments you're always
threatening to do, but never get around to doing? Would you like
to explain the triboelectric effect and how it relates to antennas
and transmission lines? Perhaps you're an expert on atmospheric
electricity and can tell us all about it. I'd especially like to
hear how the wind "rubbing on conductive parts" causes noise. Cecil
was too chicken to do any meaningful experiments with this, maybe you
can inspire us with your courage and show us how it's done. It'll
sure beat the tired, old attempts at sarcasm you're always posting here,
and probably increase your credibility, too.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH