On Sun, 9 Jul 2006 07:12:11 +1000, in alt.internet.wireless , "Rod
Speed" wrote:

John L. Sielke wrote:

Always amazinmg how when some people are proven wrong, the
revert to the "Is NOT, IS NOT," type of argument used by small
children, then when that doesn't work, the argument becomes irrelevant.

Never ever could bull**** its way out of a wet paper bag.

Rod, I suggest you LEARN something from your intellectual and
technical betters BEFORE you show the world your ignorance.

Never ever could bull**** its way out of a wet paper bag.

While your original was technically correct, its completely
irrelevant to what was actually being discussed, WHETHER
THE RECEIVE ANTENNA EVER RADIATES ENOUGH TO
BE RELEVANT TO THE EIRP RESTRICTION.

I've not been following this thread, but I can tell you straight off,
I am significantly more inclined to believe the guys who are not
shouting and hurling abuse.

Make of that what you will, but my suggestion is to counter with
rational argument backed up by references and facts, rather than
insults and obscenities.

--
Mark McIntyre